Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KFH - OAKLAND 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KFH - OAKLAND
CCN 050075 | CA | 365 beds | Current EBITDA $-71.9M → Pro Forma $-12.3M (+$59.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.13B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-71.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$59.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-12.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$43.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$59.5M
Modeled Uplift
$43.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$16.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $43.2M (vs $59.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$22.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$22.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$13.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$724K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$59.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$22.6M$22.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$21.8M$622K$22.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.5M$10.3M$13.8M$43.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$724K$724K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$5.7M$11.3M$17.0M$22.6M$22.6M$22.6M$22.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$5.6M$11.2M$16.8M$22.4M$22.4M$22.4M$22.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$4.6M$9.2M$13.8M$13.8M$13.8M$13.8M$13.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$362K$724K$724K$724K$724K$724K$724K
Cumulative$0$16.2M$32.4M$48.3M$59.5M$59.5M$59.5M$59.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $59.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-71.9M$-71.9M-6.3%
Year 1$-74.0M+$39.7M$-34.3M-3.0%
Year 2$-76.2M+$59.5M$-16.7M-1.5%
Year 3$-78.5M+$59.5M$-19.0M-1.7%
Year 4$-80.9M+$59.5M$-21.3M-1.9%
Year 5$-83.3M+$59.5M$-23.8M-2.1%
$-718.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-261.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$457.1M
Value Created
$-23.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-114.4M
Organic Growth
$595.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-23.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$11.3M$17.0M$22.6M$27.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$11.2M$16.8M$22.4M$26.9M
A/R Days Reduction$6.9M$10.3M$13.8M$16.5M
Clean Claim Rate$362K$543K$724K$869K
Total$29.8M$44.6M$59.5M$71.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 155 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-6.3%-15.5%-4.3%3.5%
P44
Net-to-Gross29.2%17.7%22.8%28.9%
P76
Occupancy76.2%54.3%65.4%74.6%
P77
Rev/Bed$3.1M$1.3M$1.9M$2.7M
P83
Exp/Bed$3.3M$1.5M$2.0M$2.8M
P88

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML