Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SUMMIT MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 06:49 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SUMMIT MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 050043 | CA | 403 beds | Current EBITDA $29.4M → Pro Forma $57.3M (+$27.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$529.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$29.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$27.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$57.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$20.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$27.9M
Modeled Uplift
$17.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$10.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $17.2M (vs $27.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$339K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$27.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.6M$10.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.2M$291K$10.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.6M$4.8M$6.4M$20.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$339K$339K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.6M$5.3M$7.9M$10.6M$10.6M$10.6M$10.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.6M$5.2M$7.9M$10.5M$10.5M$10.5M$10.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.1M$4.3M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$170K$339K$339K$339K$339K$339K$339K
Cumulative$0$7.6M$15.2M$22.6M$27.9M$27.9M$27.9M$27.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $27.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.9x73% / 15.6x75% / 16.4x77% / 17.3x
9.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 12.0x68% / 13.5x70% / 14.3x72% / 15.0x
10.0x55% / 9.1x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x68% / 13.2x
11.0x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.7x
12.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.2x
Headroom (turns)
33%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 33% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.3x, adding 4.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$29.4M$29.4M5.5%
Year 1$30.3M+$18.6M$48.8M9.2%
Year 2$31.2M+$27.9M$59.0M11.1%
Year 3$32.1M+$27.9M$60.0M11.3%
Year 4$33.1M+$27.9M$60.9M11.5%
Year 5$34.1M+$27.9M$61.9M11.7%
$293.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$681.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$387.4M
Value Created
$61.9M
Exit EBITDA
$46.8M
Organic Growth
$278.7M
RCM Value Creation
$61.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.3M$7.9M$10.6M$12.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.2M$7.9M$10.5M$12.6M
A/R Days Reduction$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$7.7M
Clean Claim Rate$170K$254K$339K$407K
Total$13.9M$20.9M$27.9M$33.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 147 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.5%-15.9%-4.5%3.7%
P80
Net-to-Gross28.8%18.1%23.7%29.1%
P73
Occupancy36.9%54.9%65.8%75.3%
P3
Rev/Bed$1.3M$1.4M$1.9M$2.7M
P22
Exp/Bed$1.2M$1.5M$2.0M$2.8M
P16

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML