Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MILLS PENINSULA MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 19:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MILLS PENINSULA MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 050007 | CA | 241 beds | Current EBITDA $26.1M → Pro Forma $63.2M (+$37.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$704.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$26.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$37.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$63.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$27.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$37.1M
Modeled Uplift
$25.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$11.6M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $25.5M (vs $37.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$14.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$14.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$451K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$37.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$14.1M$14.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$13.6M$388K$14.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.2M$6.4M$8.6M$27.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$451K$451K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.5M$7.0M$10.6M$14.1M$14.1M$14.1M$14.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.5M$7.0M$10.5M$14.0M$14.0M$14.0M$14.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.9M$5.7M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$226K$451K$451K$451K$451K$451K$451K
Cumulative$0$10.1M$20.2M$30.1M$37.1M$37.1M$37.1M$37.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $37.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x73% / 15.6x78% / 17.7x82% / 19.8x84% / 20.8x85% / 21.9x
9.0x68% / 13.5x73% / 15.4x77% / 17.2x79% / 18.2x80% / 19.1x
10.0x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.5x72% / 15.2x74% / 16.0x76% / 16.9x
11.0x60% / 10.5x64% / 12.0x68% / 13.5x70% / 14.3x72% / 15.0x
12.0x56% / 9.3x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.1x67% / 12.8x68% / 13.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.0x
Headroom (turns)
46%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 46% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.5x, adding 5.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$26.1M$26.1M3.7%
Year 1$26.9M+$24.7M$51.6M7.3%
Year 2$27.7M+$37.1M$64.8M9.2%
Year 3$28.5M+$37.1M$65.6M9.3%
Year 4$29.4M+$37.1M$66.5M9.4%
Year 5$30.3M+$37.1M$67.4M9.6%
$261.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$741.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$479.7M
Value Created
$67.4M
Exit EBITDA
$41.6M
Organic Growth
$370.7M
RCM Value Creation
$67.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$7.0M$10.6M$14.1M$16.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$7.0M$10.5M$14.0M$16.7M
A/R Days Reduction$4.3M$6.4M$8.6M$10.3M
Clean Claim Rate$226K$338K$451K$541K
Total$18.5M$27.8M$37.1M$44.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 194 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.7%-15.3%-3.9%4.8%
P73
Net-to-Gross35.5%17.1%22.3%28.9%
P89
Occupancy53.9%52.9%65.4%76.1%
P27
Rev/Bed$2.9M$1.1M$1.6M$2.5M
P82
Exp/Bed$2.8M$1.2M$1.8M$2.6M
P79

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML