Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — RIVENDELL ARKANSAS 2026-04-26 12:24 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — RIVENDELL ARKANSAS
CCN 044007 | AR | 79 beds | Current EBITDA $5.8M → Pro Forma $6.9M (+$1.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$20.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$783K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$1.1M
Modeled Uplift
$744K
Risk-Adjusted
-$330K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$408K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$404K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$248K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$13K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$408K$408K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$393K$11K$404K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$63K$186K$248K$783K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$13K$13K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$102K$204K$306K$408K$408K$408K$408K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$101K$202K$303K$404K$404K$404K$404K
A/R Days Reduction$0$83K$166K$248K$248K$248K$248K$248K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K
Cumulative$0$293K$585K$871K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
9.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
10.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x
11.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x
12.0x27% / 3.3x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.6x
Headroom (turns)
-10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.1x, adding 1.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.8M$5.8M28.5%
Year 1$6.0M+$716K$6.7M32.9%
Year 2$6.2M+$1.1M$7.3M35.5%
Year 3$6.4M+$1.1M$7.4M36.4%
Year 4$6.6M+$1.1M$7.6M37.4%
Year 5$6.8M+$1.1M$7.8M38.3%
$58.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$86.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$27.9M
Value Created
$7.8M
Exit EBITDA
$9.3M
Organic Growth
$10.7M
RCM Value Creation
$7.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$204K$306K$408K$490K
Denial Rate Reductio$202K$303K$404K$485K
A/R Days Reduction$124K$186K$248K$298K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$10K$13K$16K
Total$537K$806K$1.1M$1.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 36 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin28.5%-15.7%0.0%9.2%
P97
Net-to-Gross42.5%23.3%30.0%42.6%
P72
Occupancy69.7%23.9%44.9%70.1%
P72
Rev/Bed$258K$305K$447K$708K
P17
Exp/Bed$185K$293K$415K$781K
P6

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML