Investability Score
Hold / Selective β investigate specific opportunities but be prepared for execution risk.
51
/ 100 (C)
Financial Health16/25
RCM Upside5/25
Market Position13/20
Demand Defensibility8/15
Operational Efficiency9/15
Entry Multiple: 8.0x β 10.0x
Est. MOIC: 1.9x
Risk Factors:
Catalysts:
- Strong commercial payer base protects revenue
- Limited competition supports pricing power
Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)
-11.1%
RΒ²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: 28.5%
Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-39.4%, 17.2%]. P35 nationally.
| Driver | Value | Effect | Explanation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue/Bed | 258454.911 | -0.1844 | Lower Revenue/Bed decreases predicted margin | |
| Expense/Bed | 184686.418 | +0.1814 | Higher Expense/Bed increases predicted margin | |
| Reimbursement Quality | 0.344 | -0.0410 | Higher Reimbursement Quality decreases predicted m | |
| Bed Utilization Value | 180152.081 | -0.0230 | Lower Bed Utilization Value decreases predicted ma | |
| State Peer Margin | -0.075 | -0.0222 | Lower State Peer Margin decreases predicted margin |
Suburban Community Hospit
Archetype
47.3%
Distress Risk
$0
RCM Opportunity
D
Opportunity Grade
28.5%
Projected Margin
Cluster: Suburban Community Hospital
Percentile within cluster: P94. Community hospitals β the largest PE deal category. Focus on RCM improvement and cost optimization at 9-11x.
Nearest Peers
| Hospital | State | Beds |
|---|---|---|
| CLARA MAASS MEDICAL CENTER | NJ | 259 |
| PRESENCE SAINTS MARY & ELIZABETH MED | IL | 266 |
| ADVENTIST HEALTH BAKERSFIELD | CA | 254 |
| BRISTOL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER | TN | 244 |
| HOLSTON VALLEY HOSP & MED CTR | TN | 286 |
| SPRINGFIELD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER | OH | 230 |
Distress Analysis
Risk: Elevated
National distress rate: 49.3%
AR distress rate: 53.3%
Model AUC: 0.629
| Factor | Value | Contribution | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Occupancy Rate | 0.697 | -0.160 | ▼ risk |
| Revenue Per Bed | 258454.911 | +0.078 | ▲ risk |
| Medicare Day Pct | 0.073 | -0.044 | ▼ risk |
| Medicaid Day Pct | 0.117 | +0.028 | ▲ risk |
| Net To Gross Ratio | 0.425 | +0.025 | ▲ risk |
| Beds | 79.000 | -0.009 | ▼ risk |
RCM Improvement Opportunity
Total (risk-adjusted): $0
Current margin: 28.5%
Projected margin: 28.5%
Grade: D
Comps: 35
Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.
| Lever | Current | Benchmark | Gap | Impact | Confidence | Timeline |
|---|
Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)
A
RCM Grade
Strong RCM profile β likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.
| Metric | Predicted | 90% CI | Percentile | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denial Rate | 2.0% | [2.0%, 25.0%] | P0 | Strong β predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall |
| Days in AR | 25.0 | [25.0, 75.0] | P0 | Strong β predicted days in ar is in the top third nationally |
| Clean Claim Rate | 98.0% | [80.0%, 98.0%] | P0 | Strong β predicted clean claim rate is in the top third. |
| Net Collection Rate | 99.5% | [90.0%, 99.5%] | P8 | Strong β predicted net collection rate is in the top third. |