Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ARKANSAS CHILDRENS NORTHWEST 2026-04-26 03:58 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ARKANSAS CHILDRENS NORTHWEST
CCN 043301 | AR | 24 beds | Current EBITDA $8.1M → Pro Forma $14.1M (+$6.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$113.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$14.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$6.0M
Modeled Uplift
$4.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.5M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.5M (vs $6.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$73K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.3M$2.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.2M$62K$2.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$349K$1.0M$1.4M$4.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$73K$73K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$568K$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$562K$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$461K$922K$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$36K$73K$73K$73K$73K$73K$73K
Cumulative$0$1.6M$3.3M$4.8M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x60% / 10.6x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.4x72% / 15.2x
9.0x55% / 9.1x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x67% / 13.2x
10.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.1x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x
11.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 8.0x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x
12.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x54% / 8.6x55% / 9.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.6x
Headroom (turns)
25%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 25% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.9x, adding 3.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.1M$8.1M7.2%
Year 1$8.4M+$4.0M$12.4M10.9%
Year 2$8.6M+$6.0M$14.6M12.9%
Year 3$8.9M+$6.0M$14.9M13.1%
Year 4$9.1M+$6.0M$15.1M13.3%
Year 5$9.4M+$6.0M$15.4M13.6%
$81.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$169.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$88.1M
Value Created
$15.4M
Exit EBITDA
$12.9M
Organic Growth
$59.8M
RCM Value Creation
$15.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.7M
A/R Days Reduction$691K$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M
Clean Claim Rate$36K$55K$73K$87K
Total$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$7.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 53 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.2%-23.7%-13.9%-0.5%
P83
Net-to-Gross50.2%29.2%37.1%48.2%
P77
Occupancy68.3%20.3%34.1%55.3%
P92
Rev/Bed$4.7M$374K$630K$943K
P98
Exp/Bed$4.4M$406K$760K$1.0M
P98

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML