Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — EVEREST REHABILITATION HOSPITAL BENT 2026-04-26 12:30 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — EVEREST REHABILITATION HOSPITAL BENT
CCN 043036 | AR | 36 beds | Current EBITDA $-405K → Pro Forma $341K (+$745K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$14.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-405K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$745K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$341K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+527bps
Margin Improvement
$543K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$745K
Modeled Uplift
$522K
Risk-Adjusted
-$224K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$283K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$281K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$172K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$745K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$283K$283K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$272K$8K$281K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$43K$129K$172K$543K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$71K$142K$212K$283K$283K$283K$283K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$70K$140K$210K$281K$281K$281K$281K
A/R Days Reduction$0$57K$115K$172K$172K$172K$172K$172K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$203K$406K$605K$745K$745K$745K$745K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $745K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-10.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
16.6x
Headroom (turns)
255%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 255% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -10.1x, adding 109.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-405K$-405K-2.9%
Year 1$-417K+$497K$80K0.6%
Year 2$-429K+$745K$316K2.2%
Year 3$-442K+$745K$303K2.1%
Year 4$-456K+$745K$290K2.0%
Year 5$-469K+$745K$276K2.0%
$-4.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$3.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$7.1M
Value Created
$276K
Exit EBITDA
$-645K
Organic Growth
$7.5M
RCM Value Creation
$276K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$142K$212K$283K$340K
Denial Rate Reductio$140K$210K$281K$337K
A/R Days Reduction$86K$129K$172K$207K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$373K$559K$745K$895K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 60 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-2.9%-23.9%-13.9%1.9%
P68
Net-to-Gross52.3%28.4%36.2%48.9%
P85
Occupancy64.3%20.3%34.0%60.2%
P78
Rev/Bed$393K$351K$525K$771K
P35
Exp/Bed$404K$377K$646K$935K
P30

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML