Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHI ST. VINCENT HOT SPRINGS REHABILI 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHI ST. VINCENT HOT SPRINGS REHABILI
CCN 043035 | AR | 48 beds | Current EBITDA $6.8M → Pro Forma $8.1M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$25.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$8.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$957K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$988K
Risk-Adjusted
-$326K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$499K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$494K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$304K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$16K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$499K$499K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$481K$14K$494K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$77K$227K$304K$957K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$16K$16K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$125K$250K$374K$499K$499K$499K$499K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$124K$247K$371K$494K$494K$494K$494K
A/R Days Reduction$0$101K$203K$304K$304K$304K$304K$304K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K
Cumulative$0$358K$715K$1.1M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.6x51% / 7.7x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x
9.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x
10.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x
11.0x32% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x
12.0x27% / 3.3x32% / 4.1x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.6x
Headroom (turns)
-9%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -9% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.1x, adding 1.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.8M$6.8M27.4%
Year 1$7.0M+$876K$7.9M31.7%
Year 2$7.2M+$1.3M$8.6M34.3%
Year 3$7.5M+$1.3M$8.8M35.2%
Year 4$7.7M+$1.3M$9.0M36.1%
Year 5$7.9M+$1.3M$9.2M37.0%
$68.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$101.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$33.2M
Value Created
$9.2M
Exit EBITDA
$10.9M
Organic Growth
$13.1M
RCM Value Creation
$9.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$250K$374K$499K$599K
Denial Rate Reductio$247K$371K$494K$593K
A/R Days Reduction$152K$228K$304K$365K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$16K$19K
Total$657K$985K$1.3M$1.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 63 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin27.4%-24.0%-11.5%6.0%
P95
Net-to-Gross67.7%28.7%38.0%48.9%
P94
Occupancy87.9%20.5%41.8%65.9%
P92
Rev/Bed$520K$325K$441K$722K
P54
Exp/Bed$378K$330K$503K$862K
P33

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML