Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHI ST. VINCENT SHERWOOD REHABILITAT 2026-04-26 08:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHI ST. VINCENT SHERWOOD REHABILITAT
CCN 043031 | AR | 80 beds | Current EBITDA $4.5M → Pro Forma $5.8M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$25.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$962K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$990K
Risk-Adjusted
-$330K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$502K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$497K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$305K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$16K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$502K$502K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$483K$14K$497K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$77K$228K$305K$962K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$16K$16K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$125K$251K$376K$502K$502K$502K$502K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$124K$248K$373K$497K$497K$497K$497K
A/R Days Reduction$0$102K$204K$305K$305K$305K$305K$305K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K
Cumulative$0$359K$719K$1.1M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
9.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
10.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x
11.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x
12.0x31% / 3.8x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.0x
Headroom (turns)
-1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.5x, adding 1.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.5M$4.5M18.0%
Year 1$4.6M+$880K$5.5M22.0%
Year 2$4.8M+$1.3M$6.1M24.3%
Year 3$4.9M+$1.3M$6.3M24.9%
Year 4$5.1M+$1.3M$6.4M25.5%
Year 5$5.2M+$1.3M$6.6M26.1%
$45.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$72.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$26.9M
Value Created
$6.6M
Exit EBITDA
$7.2M
Organic Growth
$13.2M
RCM Value Creation
$6.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$251K$376K$502K$602K
Denial Rate Reductio$248K$373K$497K$596K
A/R Days Reduction$153K$229K$305K$366K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$16K$19K
Total$660K$990K$1.3M$1.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 36 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin18.0%-15.7%0.0%9.2%
P81
Net-to-Gross66.4%23.3%30.0%42.6%
P94
Occupancy91.8%23.9%44.9%70.1%
P94
Rev/Bed$314K$305K$447K$708K
P25
Exp/Bed$257K$293K$415K$781K
P17

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML