Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH - FORT SMITH 2026-04-26 07:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH - FORT SMITH
CCN 042006 | AR | 34 beds | Current EBITDA $1.6M → Pro Forma $2.2M (+$610K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$11.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$610K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+530bps
Margin Improvement
$442K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$610K
Modeled Uplift
$399K
Risk-Adjusted
-$211K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$230K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$230K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$140K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$610K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$230K$230K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$222K$8K$230K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$35K$105K$140K$442K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$58K$115K$173K$230K$230K$230K$230K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$58K$115K$173K$230K$230K$230K$230K
A/R Days Reduction$0$47K$93K$140K$140K$140K$140K$140K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$167K$333K$495K$610K$610K$610K$610K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $610K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x
9.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x
10.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x
11.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x
12.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.4x
Headroom (turns)
6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.1x, adding 2.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.6M$1.6M13.8%
Year 1$1.6M+$407K$2.0M17.7%
Year 2$1.7M+$610K$2.3M19.9%
Year 3$1.7M+$610K$2.3M20.3%
Year 4$1.8M+$610K$2.4M20.8%
Year 5$1.8M+$610K$2.4M21.2%
$15.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$26.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$11.1M
Value Created
$2.4M
Exit EBITDA
$2.5M
Organic Growth
$6.1M
RCM Value Creation
$2.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$115K$173K$230K$276K
Denial Rate Reductio$115K$173K$230K$276K
A/R Days Reduction$70K$105K$140K$168K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$305K$458K$610K$732K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 58 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.8%-24.2%-14.2%1.6%
P91
Net-to-Gross16.9%28.6%36.2%48.7%
P3
Occupancy42.2%20.3%34.0%59.3%
P59
Rev/Bed$339K$364K$548K$825K
P22
Exp/Bed$292K$383K$665K$969K
P14

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML