Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ASHLEY COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ASHLEY COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 041323 | AR | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-7.8M → Pro Forma $-6.0M (+$1.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$33.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-7.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-6.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$1.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$587K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.2M (vs $1.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$675K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$668K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$410K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$22K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$675K$675K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$649K$19K$668K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$103K$307K$410K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$22K$22K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$169K$337K$506K$675K$675K$675K$675K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$167K$334K$501K$668K$668K$668K$668K
A/R Days Reduction$0$137K$274K$410K$410K$410K$410K$410K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K
Cumulative$0$483K$966K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-7.8M$-7.8M-23.0%
Year 1$-8.0M+$1.2M$-6.8M-20.2%
Year 2$-8.2M+$1.8M$-6.5M-19.1%
Year 3$-8.5M+$1.8M$-6.7M-19.9%
Year 4$-8.7M+$1.8M$-7.0M-20.6%
Year 5$-9.0M+$1.8M$-7.2M-21.4%
$-77.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-79.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$-1.8M
Value Created
$-7.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-12.4M
Organic Growth
$17.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-7.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$337K$506K$675K$809K
Denial Rate Reductio$334K$501K$668K$801K
A/R Days Reduction$205K$308K$410K$492K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$16K$22K$26K
Total$887K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 53 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-23.0%-24.4%-14.4%-1.1%
P28
Net-to-Gross46.6%28.9%36.2%48.8%
P64
Occupancy44.6%20.3%34.1%56.0%
P62
Rev/Bed$1.3M$367K$596K$794K
P91
Exp/Bed$1.7M$404K$703K$987K
P92

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML