Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FORREST CITY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FORREST CITY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 040019 | AR | 48 beds | Current EBITDA $-5.2M → Pro Forma $-3.6M (+$1.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$30.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-5.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-3.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$1.6M
Modeled Uplift
$1.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$584K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$605K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$599K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$368K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$19K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$605K$605K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$582K$17K$599K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$93K$275K$368K$1.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$19K$19K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$151K$303K$454K$605K$605K$605K$605K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$150K$299K$449K$599K$599K$599K$599K
A/R Days Reduction$0$123K$245K$368K$368K$368K$368K$368K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K
Cumulative$0$433K$867K$1.3M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-5.2M$-5.2M-17.3%
Year 1$-5.4M+$1.1M$-4.3M-14.3%
Year 2$-5.5M+$1.6M$-4.0M-13.1%
Year 3$-5.7M+$1.6M$-4.1M-13.6%
Year 4$-5.9M+$1.6M$-4.3M-14.2%
Year 5$-6.1M+$1.6M$-4.5M-14.8%
$-52.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-49.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$3.1M
Value Created
$-4.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-8.3M
Organic Growth
$15.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-4.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$303K$454K$605K$726K
Denial Rate Reductio$299K$449K$599K$719K
A/R Days Reduction$184K$276K$368K$442K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$15K$19K$23K
Total$796K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 63 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-17.3%-24.0%-11.5%6.0%
P41
Net-to-Gross19.1%28.7%38.0%48.9%
P11
Occupancy33.9%20.5%41.8%65.9%
P41
Rev/Bed$630K$325K$441K$722K
P63
Exp/Bed$739K$330K$503K$862K
P60

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML