Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — THE GUIDANCE CENTER INC. 2026-04-26 09:32 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — THE GUIDANCE CENTER INC.
CCN 034023 | AZ | 16 beds | Current EBITDA $2.2M → Pro Forma $3.5M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$24.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$944K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$921K
Risk-Adjusted
-$374K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$492K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$488K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$300K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$16K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$492K$492K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$474K$14K$488K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$76K$224K$300K$944K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$16K$16K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$123K$246K$369K$492K$492K$492K$492K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$122K$244K$366K$488K$488K$488K$488K
A/R Days Reduction$0$100K$200K$300K$300K$300K$300K$300K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K
Cumulative$0$353K$705K$1.1M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x57% / 9.6x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.5x68% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x
9.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.7x63% / 11.4x64% / 12.0x
10.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x
11.0x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
12.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.2x
Headroom (turns)
19%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 19% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.3x, adding 3.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.2M$2.2M8.8%
Year 1$2.2M+$864K$3.1M12.5%
Year 2$2.3M+$1.3M$3.6M14.5%
Year 3$2.4M+$1.3M$3.7M14.8%
Year 4$2.4M+$1.3M$3.7M15.1%
Year 5$2.5M+$1.3M$3.8M15.4%
$21.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$41.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$20.2M
Value Created
$3.8M
Exit EBITDA
$3.4M
Organic Growth
$13.0M
RCM Value Creation
$3.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$246K$369K$492K$591K
Denial Rate Reductio$244K$366K$488K$585K
A/R Days Reduction$150K$225K$300K$360K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$16K$19K
Total$648K$972K$1.3M$1.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 30 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.8%-10.3%-3.4%7.6%
P76
Net-to-Gross100.0%19.7%36.7%50.7%
P92
Occupancy74.0%14.7%35.0%52.6%
P87
Rev/Bed$1.5M$812K$1.4M$2.0M
P50
Exp/Bed$1.4M$1.1M$1.6M$3.1M
P43

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML