Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MOUNTAIN VALLEY REGIONAL REHABILITAT 2026-04-26 06:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MOUNTAIN VALLEY REGIONAL REHABILITAT
CCN 033036 | AZ | 44 beds | Current EBITDA $3.5M → Pro Forma $4.9M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$25.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$983K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$972K
Risk-Adjusted
-$376K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$513K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$507K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$312K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$16K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$513K$513K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$493K$14K$507K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$79K$233K$312K$983K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$16K$16K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$128K$256K$384K$513K$513K$513K$513K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$127K$254K$381K$507K$507K$507K$507K
A/R Days Reduction$0$104K$208K$312K$312K$312K$312K$312K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K
Cumulative$0$367K$734K$1.1M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x
9.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x
10.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x
11.0x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x
12.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.4x
Headroom (turns)
6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.1x, adding 2.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.5M$3.5M13.8%
Year 1$3.6M+$899K$4.5M17.7%
Year 2$3.7M+$1.3M$5.1M19.9%
Year 3$3.9M+$1.3M$5.2M20.3%
Year 4$4.0M+$1.3M$5.3M20.8%
Year 5$4.1M+$1.3M$5.4M21.2%
$35.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$59.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$24.5M
Value Created
$5.4M
Exit EBITDA
$5.6M
Organic Growth
$13.5M
RCM Value Creation
$5.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$256K$384K$513K$615K
Denial Rate Reductio$254K$381K$507K$609K
A/R Days Reduction$156K$234K$312K$374K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$16K$20K
Total$674K$1.0M$1.3M$1.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 53 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.8%-10.6%-0.8%5.3%
P87
Net-to-Gross73.6%19.9%36.7%51.7%
P94
Occupancy78.1%27.8%47.8%68.4%
P92
Rev/Bed$582K$281K$576K$1.4M
P52
Exp/Bed$502K$347K$776K$1.7M
P38

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML