Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NORTHERN COCHISE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:08 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NORTHERN COCHISE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
CCN 031302 | AZ | 24 beds | Current EBITDA $-627K → Pro Forma $336K (+$963K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$18.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-627K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$963K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$336K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$702K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

59%
Realization (C)
$963K
Modeled Uplift
$571K
Risk-Adjusted
-$392K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$366K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$362K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$223K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$963K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$366K$366K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$352K$10K$362K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$56K$167K$223K$702K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$92K$183K$275K$366K$366K$366K$366K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$91K$181K$272K$362K$362K$362K$362K
A/R Days Reduction$0$74K$149K$223K$223K$223K$223K$223K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$262K$525K$781K$963K$963K$963K$963K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $963K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-15.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
22.3x
Headroom (turns)
343%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 343% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -15.8x, adding 114.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-627K$-627K-3.4%
Year 1$-646K+$642K$-4K-0.0%
Year 2$-665K+$963K$298K1.6%
Year 3$-685K+$963K$278K1.5%
Year 4$-706K+$963K$257K1.4%
Year 5$-727K+$963K$236K1.3%
$-6.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$2.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$8.9M
Value Created
$236K
Exit EBITDA
$-999K
Organic Growth
$9.6M
RCM Value Creation
$236K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$183K$275K$366K$439K
Denial Rate Reductio$181K$272K$362K$435K
A/R Days Reduction$111K$167K$223K$267K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$14K
Total$482K$722K$963K$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 39 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.4%-10.1%-1.8%7.9%
P44
Net-to-Gross52.7%19.6%38.9%51.2%
P75
Occupancy12.5%16.7%35.6%63.1%
P13
Rev/Bed$763K$442K$1.0M$2.0M
P39
Exp/Bed$789K$519K$1.4M$3.0M
P31

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML