Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ARIZONA GENERAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ARIZONA GENERAL HOSPITAL
CCN 030136 | AZ | 16 beds | Current EBITDA $10.1M → Pro Forma $15.2M (+$5.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$97.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$10.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$15.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$5.1M
Modeled Uplift
$3.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.4M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.7M (vs $5.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$62K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.9M$1.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.9M$53K$1.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$298K$883K$1.2M$3.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$62K$62K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$485K$971K$1.5M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$481K$961K$1.4M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$394K$788K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$31K$62K$62K$62K$62K$62K$62K
Cumulative$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.3x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x
9.0x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.8x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
10.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x
11.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
12.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.9x
Headroom (turns)
13%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 13% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.6x, adding 2.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$10.1M$10.1M10.4%
Year 1$10.4M+$3.4M$13.8M14.2%
Year 2$10.7M+$5.1M$15.8M16.3%
Year 3$11.1M+$5.1M$16.2M16.7%
Year 4$11.4M+$5.1M$16.5M17.0%
Year 5$11.7M+$5.1M$16.8M17.3%
$101.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$185.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$84.0M
Value Created
$16.8M
Exit EBITDA
$16.1M
Organic Growth
$51.1M
RCM Value Creation
$16.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$971K$1.5M$1.9M$2.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$961K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M
A/R Days Reduction$591K$886K$1.2M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$31K$47K$62K$75K
Total$2.6M$3.8M$5.1M$6.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 30 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.4%-10.3%-3.4%7.6%
P84
Net-to-Gross15.5%19.7%36.7%50.7%
P4
Occupancy35.0%14.7%35.0%52.6%
P50
Rev/Bed$6.1M$812K$1.4M$2.0M
P96
Exp/Bed$5.4M$1.1M$1.6M$3.1M
P87

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML