Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BANNER THUNDERBIRD MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BANNER THUNDERBIRD MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 030089 | AZ | 539 beds | Current EBITDA $57.0M → Pro Forma $92.4M (+$35.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$674.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$57.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$35.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$92.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$25.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$35.5M
Modeled Uplift
$23.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$11.9M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $23.6M (vs $35.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$13.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$13.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$432K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$35.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$13.5M$13.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$13.0M$371K$13.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.1M$6.1M$8.2M$25.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$432K$432K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT26.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.4M$6.7M$10.1M$13.5M$13.5M$13.5M$13.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.3M$6.7M$10.0M$13.4M$13.4M$13.4M$13.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.7M$5.5M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$216K$432K$432K$432K$432K$432K$432K
Cumulative$0$9.7M$19.3M$28.8M$35.5M$35.5M$35.5M$35.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $35.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.2x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.1x
9.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.6x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.2x
10.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x
11.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x
12.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.3x
Headroom (turns)
20%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 20% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.2x, adding 3.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$57.0M$57.0M8.4%
Year 1$58.7M+$23.7M$82.3M12.2%
Year 2$60.4M+$35.5M$95.9M14.2%
Year 3$62.2M+$35.5M$97.7M14.5%
Year 4$64.1M+$35.5M$99.6M14.8%
Year 5$66.0M+$35.5M$101.5M15.1%
$569.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.12B
Exit EV (11x)
$547.0M
Value Created
$101.5M
Exit EBITDA
$90.7M
Organic Growth
$354.8M
RCM Value Creation
$101.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.7M$10.1M$13.5M$16.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.7M$10.0M$13.4M$16.0M
A/R Days Reduction$4.1M$6.2M$8.2M$9.8M
Clean Claim Rate$216K$324K$432K$518K
Total$17.7M$26.6M$35.5M$42.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 20 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.4%-4.9%-0.6%6.8%
P75
Net-to-Gross23.3%16.3%23.4%26.4%
P45
Occupancy64.7%57.7%65.7%80.9%
P40
Rev/Bed$1.3M$1.3M$1.6M$2.1M
P20
Exp/Bed$1.1M$1.1M$1.4M$1.8M
P25

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML