Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FLAGSTAFF MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FLAGSTAFF MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 030023 | AZ | 242 beds | Current EBITDA $-4.0M → Pro Forma $21.2M (+$25.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$477.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-4.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$25.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$21.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$18.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$25.1M
Modeled Uplift
$17.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $17.6M (vs $25.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$306K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$25.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.6M$9.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$9.2M$263K$9.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.5M$4.3M$5.8M$18.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$306K$306K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.4M$4.8M$7.2M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.4M$4.7M$7.1M$9.5M$9.5M$9.5M$9.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.9M$3.9M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$153K$306K$306K$306K$306K$306K$306K
Cumulative$0$6.8M$13.7M$20.4M$25.1M$25.1M$25.1M$25.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $25.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-1.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
8.1x
Headroom (turns)
124%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 124% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -1.6x, adding 100.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-4.0M$-4.0M-0.8%
Year 1$-4.1M+$16.8M$12.7M2.6%
Year 2$-4.2M+$25.1M$20.9M4.4%
Year 3$-4.3M+$25.1M$20.8M4.4%
Year 4$-4.5M+$25.1M$20.7M4.3%
Year 5$-4.6M+$25.1M$20.5M4.3%
$-39.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$225.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$265.6M
Value Created
$20.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-6.3M
Organic Growth
$251.4M
RCM Value Creation
$20.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.8M$7.2M$9.6M$11.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.7M$7.1M$9.5M$11.4M
A/R Days Reduction$2.9M$4.4M$5.8M$7.0M
Clean Claim Rate$153K$229K$306K$367K
Total$12.6M$18.9M$25.1M$30.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 39 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.8%-6.3%-0.8%6.3%
P49
Net-to-Gross33.1%16.1%20.2%33.4%
P70
Occupancy61.8%55.7%65.8%78.2%
P36
Rev/Bed$2.0M$709K$1.4M$1.9M
P78
Exp/Bed$2.0M$564K$1.3M$1.8M
P79

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML