Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WRANGELL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:33 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WRANGELL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 021305 | AK | 8 beds | Current EBITDA $97K → Pro Forma $867K (+$770K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$14.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$97K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$770K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$867K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$561K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$770K
Modeled Uplift
$504K
Risk-Adjusted
-$266K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$293K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$290K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$178K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$770K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$293K$293K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$282K$8K$290K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$45K$133K$178K$561K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT72.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$73K$146K$219K$293K$293K$293K$293K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$72K$145K$217K$290K$290K$290K$290K
A/R Days Reduction$0$59K$119K$178K$178K$178K$178K$178K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$210K$420K$624K$770K$770K$770K$770K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $770K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x129% / 63.1x134% / 70.4x139% / 77.8x141% / 81.5x143% / 85.2x
9.0x123% / 55.7x128% / 62.2x133% / 68.8x135% / 72.1x137% / 75.3x
10.0x118% / 49.8x123% / 55.7x128% / 61.6x130% / 64.5x132% / 67.5x
11.0x114% / 45.0x119% / 50.3x123% / 55.7x126% / 58.4x128% / 61.1x
12.0x110% / 41.0x115% / 45.9x119% / 50.8x121% / 53.2x123% / 55.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.6x
Headroom (turns)
85%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 85% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.9x, adding 7.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$97K$97K0.7%
Year 1$100K+$513K$614K4.2%
Year 2$103K+$770K$873K6.0%
Year 3$106K+$770K$876K6.0%
Year 4$110K+$770K$880K6.0%
Year 5$113K+$770K$883K6.0%
$974K
Entry EV (10x)
$9.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$8.7M
Value Created
$883K
Exit EBITDA
$155K
Organic Growth
$7.7M
RCM Value Creation
$883K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$146K$219K$293K$351K
Denial Rate Reductio$145K$217K$290K$348K
A/R Days Reduction$89K$134K$178K$214K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$385K$578K$770K$924K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 383 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.7%-25.3%-9.5%3.1%
P70
Net-to-Gross69.7%40.5%59.1%72.8%
P70
Occupancy30.1%15.8%26.3%42.3%
P59
Rev/Bed$1.8M$751K$1.3M$2.1M
P69
Exp/Bed$1.8M$886K$1.4M$2.3M
P64

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML