Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BROOKWOOD BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:06 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BROOKWOOD BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 010139 | AL | 429 beds | Current EBITDA $-9.8M → Pro Forma $6.2M (+$16.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$304.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-9.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$16.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$16.0M
Modeled Uplift
$9.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $9.8M (vs $16.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$195K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$16.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.1M$6.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.9M$168K$6.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$935K$2.8M$3.7M$11.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$195K$195K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.6M$6.1M$6.1M$6.1M$6.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.5M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$98K$195K$195K$195K$195K$195K$195K
Cumulative$0$4.4M$8.7M$13.0M$16.0M$16.0M$16.0M$16.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $16.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-13.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
19.9x
Headroom (turns)
306%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 306% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -13.4x, adding 112.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-9.8M$-9.8M-3.2%
Year 1$-10.1M+$10.7M$579K0.2%
Year 2$-10.4M+$16.0M$5.6M1.8%
Year 3$-10.7M+$16.0M$5.3M1.7%
Year 4$-11.1M+$16.0M$5.0M1.6%
Year 5$-11.4M+$16.0M$4.7M1.5%
$-98.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$51.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$149.4M
Value Created
$4.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-15.6M
Organic Growth
$160.4M
RCM Value Creation
$4.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.0M$4.6M$6.1M$7.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$7.2M
A/R Days Reduction$1.9M$2.8M$3.7M$4.5M
Clean Claim Rate$98K$146K$195K$234K
Total$8.0M$12.0M$16.0M$19.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 20 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.2%-7.5%-4.6%1.0%
P60
Net-to-Gross9.0%11.9%21.3%33.7%
P10
Occupancy37.2%57.9%69.3%78.2%
P10
Rev/Bed$711K$776K$1.0M$1.4M
P20
Exp/Bed$733K$790K$1.1M$1.3M
P10

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML