ML Analysis — ST. CLARE HOSPITAL
CCN 520057 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investability Score
Hold / Selective — investigate specific opportunities but be prepared for execution risk.
55
/ 100 (C)
Financial Health17/25
RCM Upside5/25
Market Position15/20
Demand Defensibility8/15
Operational Efficiency11/15
Entry Multiple: 9.5x – 11.5x
Est. MOIC: 2.3x
Risk Factors:
- Small facility (<50 beds) — limited scale
Catalysts:
- Strong commercial payer base protects revenue
- Limited competition supports pricing power
Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)
4.9%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: 25.1%
Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-23.4%, 33.2%]. P73 nationally.
| Driver | Value | Effect | Explanation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue/Bed | 2013094.023 | +0.0606 | Higher Revenue/Bed increases predicted margin | |
| State Peer Margin | 0.004 | +0.0371 | Higher State Peer Margin increases predicted margi | |
| Expense/Bed | 1508322.651 | +0.0183 | Higher Expense/Bed increases predicted margin | |
| Bed Count | 43.000 | +0.0165 | Higher Bed Count increases predicted margin | |
| Log(Beds) | 3.761 | -0.0142 | Lower Log(Beds) decreases predicted margin |
Suburban Community Hospit
Archetype
51.3%
Distress Risk
$5.3M
RCM Opportunity
C
Opportunity Grade
31.2%
Projected Margin
Cluster: Suburban Community Hospital
Percentile within cluster: P49. Community hospitals — the largest PE deal category. Focus on RCM improvement and cost optimization at 9-11x.
Nearest Peers
| Hospital | State | Beds |
|---|---|---|
| PROMEDICA HICKMAN HOSPITAL | MI | 58 |
| WATAUGA MEDICAL CENTER | NC | 95 |
| ST LUKES HOSPITAL - EASTON CAMPUS | PA | 29 |
| CULPEPER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | VA | 70 |
| SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL | VA | 80 |
| SPECTRUM HEALTH LUDINGTON | MI | 45 |
Distress Analysis
Risk: High
National distress rate: 49.3%
WI distress rate: 34.5%
Model AUC: 0.629
| Factor | Value | Contribution | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Occupancy Rate | 0.390 | +0.125 | ▲ risk |
| Revenue Per Bed | 2013094.023 | -0.026 | ▼ risk |
| Medicare Day Pct | 0.461 | +0.023 | ▲ risk |
| Medicaid Day Pct | 0.073 | -0.016 | ▼ risk |
| Beds | 43.000 | -0.014 | ▼ risk |
| Net To Gross Ratio | 0.339 | -0.013 | ▼ risk |
RCM Improvement Opportunity
Total (risk-adjusted): $5.3M
Current margin: 25.1%
Projected margin: 31.2%
Grade: C
Comps: 89
Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.
| Lever | Current | Benchmark | Gap | Impact | Confidence | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payer Mix Optimization | 0.466 | 0.648 | 18.2% | $2.7M | 50% | 24mo |
| Net-to-Gross Ratio Improvement | 0.339 | 0.512 | 17.4% | $1.8M | 65% | 18mo |
| Occupancy Improvement | 0.390 | 0.516 | 12.6% | $829K | 55% | 24mo |
Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)
A
RCM Grade
Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.
| Metric | Predicted | 90% CI | Percentile | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denial Rate | 2.0% | [2.0%, 25.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall |
| Days in AR | 26.8 | [25.0, 75.0] | P38 | Strong — predicted days in ar is in the top third nationally |
| Clean Claim Rate | 98.0% | [80.0%, 98.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third. |
| Net Collection Rate | 99.5% | [90.0%, 99.5%] | P8 | Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third. |