ML Analysis — THEDACARE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER -
CCN 520045 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investability Score
Hold / Selective — investigate specific opportunities but be prepared for execution risk.
59
/ 100 (C)
Financial Health17/25
RCM Upside11/25
Market Position13/20
Demand Defensibility8/15
Operational Efficiency9/15
Entry Multiple: 9.5x – 11.5x
Est. MOIC: 2.3x
Risk Factors:
Catalysts:
- Strong commercial payer base protects revenue
- Limited competition supports pricing power
Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)
1.6%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: 5.1%
Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-26.7%, 29.9%]. P66 nationally.
| Driver | Value | Effect | Explanation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| State Peer Margin | 0.004 | +0.0371 | Higher State Peer Margin increases predicted margi | |
| Reimbursement Quality | 0.308 | -0.0308 | Higher Reimbursement Quality decreases predicted m | |
| Revenue/Bed | 1779408.583 | +0.0279 | Higher Revenue/Bed increases predicted margin | |
| Log(Beds) | 4.934 | +0.0130 | Higher Log(Beds) increases predicted margin | |
| Bed Utilization Value | 1134212.953 | +0.0087 | Higher Bed Utilization Value increases predicted m |
Suburban Community Hospit
Archetype
45.5%
Distress Risk
$37K
RCM Opportunity
D
Opportunity Grade
5.1%
Projected Margin
Cluster: Suburban Community Hospital
Percentile within cluster: P18. Community hospitals — the largest PE deal category. Focus on RCM improvement and cost optimization at 9-11x.
Nearest Peers
| Hospital | State | Beds |
|---|---|---|
| CLARA MAASS MEDICAL CENTER | NJ | 259 |
| PRESENCE SAINTS MARY & ELIZABETH MED | IL | 266 |
| ADVENTIST HEALTH BAKERSFIELD | CA | 254 |
| BRISTOL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER | TN | 244 |
| HOLSTON VALLEY HOSP & MED CTR | TN | 286 |
| SPRINGFIELD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER | OH | 230 |
Distress Analysis
Risk: Elevated
National distress rate: 49.3%
WI distress rate: 34.5%
Model AUC: 0.629
| Factor | Value | Contribution | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Occupancy Rate | 0.637 | -0.104 | ▼ risk |
| Medicare Day Pct | 0.153 | -0.030 | ▼ risk |
| Medicaid Day Pct | 0.071 | -0.018 | ▼ risk |
| Net To Gross Ratio | 0.397 | +0.013 | ▲ risk |
| Revenue Per Bed | 1779408.583 | -0.012 | ▼ risk |
| Beds | 139.000 | -0.001 | ▼ risk |
RCM Improvement Opportunity
Total (risk-adjusted): $37K
Current margin: 5.1%
Projected margin: 5.1%
Grade: D
Comps: 35
Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.
| Lever | Current | Benchmark | Gap | Impact | Confidence | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Occupancy Improvement | 0.637 | 0.643 | 0.6% | $37K | 55% | 24mo |
Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)
A
RCM Grade
Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.
| Metric | Predicted | 90% CI | Percentile | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denial Rate | 2.0% | [2.0%, 25.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall |
| Days in AR | 25.0 | [25.0, 75.0] | P0 | Strong — predicted days in ar is in the top third nationally |
| Clean Claim Rate | 98.0% | [80.0%, 98.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third. |
| Net Collection Rate | 99.5% | [90.0%, 99.5%] | P8 | Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third. |