Corpus Intelligence ML Analysis — MT ASCUTNEY HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CENT 2026-04-26 09:13 UTC
ML Analysis — MT ASCUTNEY HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CENT
CCN 471302 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.

Investability Score

Hold / Selective — investigate specific opportunities but be prepared for execution risk.

53
/ 100 (C)
Financial Health2/25
RCM Upside20/25
Market Position14/20
Demand Defensibility8/15
Operational Efficiency8/15
Entry Multiple: 8.0x – 10.0x
Est. MOIC: 1.9x
Risk Factors:
  • Negative operating margin
  • Heavy Medicare dependence (>55%)
  • Small facility (<50 beds) — limited scale
  • Expenses exceed revenue
Catalysts:
  • Strong commercial payer base protects revenue
  • Limited competition supports pricing power

Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)

-16.2%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: -8.6%

Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-44.5%, 12.0%]. P26 nationally.

DriverValueEffectExplanation
State Peer Margin-0.266-0.1635
Lower State Peer Margin decreases predicted margin
Expense/Bed2598583.920-0.1160
Higher Expense/Bed decreases predicted margin
Revenue/Bed2393343.040+0.1136
Higher Revenue/Bed increases predicted margin
Bed Utilization Value1802154.524+0.0308
Higher Bed Utilization Value increases predicted m
Log(Beds)3.219-0.0268
Lower Log(Beds) decreases predicted margin
Turnaround: 24%Low turnaround probability (24%). Structural disadvantages in State Peer Margin and Expense/Bed.
Suburban Community Hospit
Archetype
42.8%
Distress Risk
$3.9M
RCM Opportunity
C
Opportunity Grade
-2.1%
Projected Margin

Cluster: Suburban Community Hospital

Percentile within cluster: P79. Community hospitals — the largest PE deal category. Focus on RCM improvement and cost optimization at 9-11x.

Nearest Peers

HospitalStateBeds
PROMEDICA HICKMAN HOSPITALMI58
WATAUGA MEDICAL CENTERNC95
ST LUKES HOSPITAL - EASTON CAMPUSPA29
CULPEPER MEMORIAL HOSPITALVA70
SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY HOSPITALVA80
SPECTRUM HEALTH LUDINGTONMI45

Distress Analysis

Risk: Elevated
National distress rate: 49.3%
VT distress rate: 86.7%
Model AUC: 0.629
FactorValueContributionDirection
Occupancy Rate0.753-0.211▼ risk
Medicaid Day Pct0.015-0.074▼ risk
Revenue Per Bed2393343.040-0.048▼ risk
Net To Gross Ratio0.476+0.048▲ risk
Medicare Day Pct0.560+0.040▲ risk
Beds25.000-0.017▼ risk

RCM Improvement Opportunity

Total (risk-adjusted): $3.9M
Current margin: -8.6%
Projected margin: -2.1%
Grade: C
Comps: 2513

Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.

LeverCurrentBenchmarkGapImpactConfidenceTimeline
Payer Mix Optimization0.4250.63220.6%$3.1M50%24mo
Net-to-Gross Ratio Improvement0.4760.59111.5%$806K65%18mo

Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)

A
RCM Grade

Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.

MetricPredicted90% CIPercentileAssessment
Denial Rate2.0%[2.0%, 25.0%]P0Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall
Days in AR28.6[25.0, 75.0]P47Strong — predicted days in ar is in the top third nationally
Clean Claim Rate98.0%[80.0%, 98.0%]P0Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third.
Net Collection Rate99.5%[90.0%, 99.5%]P8Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third.