Corpus Intelligence ML Analysis — GUNNISON VALLEY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:42 UTC
ML Analysis — GUNNISON VALLEY HOSPITAL
CCN 461306 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.

Investability Score

Buy — solid fundamentals with identifiable value creation levers. Proceed to detailed diligence.

64
/ 100 (B)
Financial Health10/25
RCM Upside19/25
Market Position18/20
Demand Defensibility7/15
Operational Efficiency10/15
Entry Multiple: 9.5x – 11.5x
Est. MOIC: 2.3x
Risk Factors:
  • Negative operating margin
  • Small facility (<50 beds) — limited scale
  • Low occupancy (<30%) — demand risk
  • Expenses exceed revenue
Catalysts:
  • Strong commercial payer base protects revenue
  • Limited competition supports pricing power

Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)

5.5%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: -6.4%

Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-22.8%, 33.8%]. P75 nationally.

DriverValueEffectExplanation
Revenue/Bed5214896.840+0.5075
Higher Revenue/Bed increases predicted margin
Expense/Bed5546695.640-0.4791
Higher Expense/Bed decreases predicted margin
State Peer Margin0.080+0.0933
Higher State Peer Margin increases predicted margi
Net-to-Gross0.771+0.0451
Higher Net-to-Gross increases predicted margin
Reimbursement Quality0.332-0.0375
Higher Reimbursement Quality decreases predicted m
Turnaround: 60%Turnaround possible (60%) but uncertain. Margin improvement depends on Revenue/Bed.
Suburban Community Hospit
Archetype
55.1%
Distress Risk
$5.7M
RCM Opportunity
D
Opportunity Grade
-2.0%
Projected Margin

Cluster: Suburban Community Hospital

Percentile within cluster: P91. Community hospitals — the largest PE deal category. Focus on RCM improvement and cost optimization at 9-11x.

Nearest Peers

HospitalStateBeds
PROMEDICA HICKMAN HOSPITALMI58
WATAUGA MEDICAL CENTERNC95
ST LUKES HOSPITAL - EASTON CAMPUSPA29
CULPEPER MEMORIAL HOSPITALVA70
SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY HOSPITALVA80
SPECTRUM HEALTH LUDINGTONMI45

Distress Analysis

Risk: High
National distress rate: 49.3%
UT distress rate: 25.0%
Model AUC: 0.629
FactorValueContributionDirection
Occupancy Rate0.266+0.240▲ risk
Revenue Per Bed5214896.840-0.215▼ risk
Net To Gross Ratio0.771+0.179▲ risk
Medicare Day Pct0.460+0.023▲ risk
Medicaid Day Pct0.110+0.021▲ risk
Beds25.000-0.017▼ risk

RCM Improvement Opportunity

Total (risk-adjusted): $5.7M
Current margin: -6.4%
Projected margin: -2.0%
Grade: D
Comps: 28

Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.

LeverCurrentBenchmarkGapImpactConfidenceTimeline
Payer Mix Optimization0.4300.75732.7%$4.9M50%24mo
Occupancy Improvement0.2660.39012.4%$817K55%24mo

Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)

A
RCM Grade

Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.

MetricPredicted90% CIPercentileAssessment
Denial Rate2.0%[2.0%, 25.0%]P0Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall
Days in AR27.3[25.0, 75.0]P40Strong — predicted days in ar is in the top third nationally
Clean Claim Rate98.0%[80.0%, 98.0%]P0Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third.
Net Collection Rate99.5%[90.0%, 99.5%]P8Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third.