ML Analysis — LDS HOSPITAL
CCN 460006 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investability Score
Hold / Selective — investigate specific opportunities but be prepared for execution risk.
56
/ 100 (C)
Financial Health10/25
RCM Upside18/25
Market Position13/20
Demand Defensibility9/15
Operational Efficiency6/15
Entry Multiple: 9.5x – 11.5x
Est. MOIC: 2.3x
Risk Factors:
- Negative operating margin
- Expenses exceed revenue
Catalysts:
- RCM optimization could add 3-5pp margin
- Strong commercial payer base protects revenue
- Volume growth opportunity from low occupancy
Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)
0.1%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: -5.5%
Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-28.2%, 28.4%]. P63 nationally.
| Driver | Value | Effect | Explanation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| State Peer Margin | 0.080 | +0.0933 | Higher State Peer Margin increases predicted margi | |
| Reimbursement Quality | 0.293 | -0.0264 | Higher Reimbursement Quality decreases predicted m | |
| Log(Beds) | 5.375 | +0.0233 | Higher Log(Beds) increases predicted margin | |
| Revenue/Bed | 1421518.287 | -0.0220 | Lower Revenue/Bed decreases predicted margin | |
| Expense/Bed | 1499476.931 | +0.0194 | Higher Expense/Bed increases predicted margin |
Turnaround: 50%Turnaround possible (50%) but uncertain. Margin improvement depends on State Peer Margin.
Suburban Community Hospit
Archetype
52.8%
Distress Risk
$4.2M
RCM Opportunity
D
Opportunity Grade
-4.1%
Projected Margin
Cluster: Suburban Community Hospital
Percentile within cluster: P59. Community hospitals — the largest PE deal category. Focus on RCM improvement and cost optimization at 9-11x.
Nearest Peers
| Hospital | State | Beds |
|---|---|---|
| CLARA MAASS MEDICAL CENTER | NJ | 259 |
| PRESENCE SAINTS MARY & ELIZABETH MED | IL | 266 |
| ADVENTIST HEALTH BAKERSFIELD | CA | 254 |
| BRISTOL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER | TN | 244 |
| HOLSTON VALLEY HOSP & MED CTR | TN | 286 |
| SPRINGFIELD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER | OH | 230 |
Distress Analysis
Risk: High
National distress rate: 49.3%
UT distress rate: 25.0%
Model AUC: 0.629
| Factor | Value | Contribution | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Occupancy Rate | 0.397 | +0.119 | ▲ risk |
| Medicare Day Pct | 0.141 | -0.032 | ▼ risk |
| Medicaid Day Pct | 0.112 | +0.023 | ▲ risk |
| Net To Gross Ratio | 0.392 | +0.010 | ▲ risk |
| Revenue Per Bed | 1421518.287 | +0.009 | ▲ risk |
| Beds | 216.000 | +0.009 | ▲ risk |
RCM Improvement Opportunity
Total (risk-adjusted): $4.2M
Current margin: -5.5%
Projected margin: -4.1%
Grade: D
Comps: 13
Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.
| Lever | Current | Benchmark | Gap | Impact | Confidence | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Occupancy Improvement | 0.397 | 0.665 | 26.9% | $1.8M | 55% | 24mo |
| Net-to-Gross Ratio Improvement | 0.392 | 0.426 | 3.4% | $1.2M | 65% | 18mo |
| Payer Mix Optimization | 0.748 | 0.829 | 8.1% | $1.2M | 50% | 24mo |
Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)
A
RCM Grade
Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.
| Metric | Predicted | 90% CI | Percentile | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denial Rate | 2.0% | [2.0%, 25.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall |
| Days in AR | 25.0 | [25.0, 75.0] | P0 | Strong — predicted days in ar is in the top third nationally |
| Clean Claim Rate | 98.0% | [80.0%, 98.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third. |
| Net Collection Rate | 99.5% | [90.0%, 99.5%] | P8 | Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third. |