ML Analysis — SACRED HEART HOSPITAL
CCN 390197 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investability Score
Speculative — only pursue if turnaround thesis is strong and entry multiple reflects risk.
43
/ 100 (D)
Financial Health3/25
RCM Upside20/25
Market Position13/20
Demand Defensibility7/15
Operational Efficiency0/15
Entry Multiple: 8.0x – 10.0x
Est. MOIC: 1.9x
Risk Factors:
- Negative operating margin
- Expenses exceed revenue
Catalysts:
- Strong commercial payer base protects revenue
Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)
-7.4%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: -9.5%
Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-35.7%, 20.9%]. P43 nationally.
| Driver | Value | Effect | Explanation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue/Bed | 492713.970 | -0.1517 | Lower Revenue/Bed decreases predicted margin | |
| Expense/Bed | 539325.263 | +0.1377 | Higher Expense/Bed increases predicted margin | |
| Reimbursement Quality | 0.099 | +0.0294 | Higher Reimbursement Quality increases predicted m | |
| Net-to-Gross | 0.121 | -0.0278 | Lower Net-to-Gross decreases predicted margin | |
| Bed Utilization Value | 286693.094 | -0.0195 | Lower Bed Utilization Value decreases predicted ma |
Turnaround: 37%Turnaround possible (37%) but uncertain. Margin improvement depends on improving Revenue/Bed.
Suburban Community Hospit
Archetype
45.4%
Distress Risk
$2.6M
RCM Opportunity
D
Opportunity Grade
-4.1%
Projected Margin
Cluster: Suburban Community Hospital
Percentile within cluster: P62. Community hospitals — the largest PE deal category. Focus on RCM improvement and cost optimization at 9-11x.
Nearest Peers
| Hospital | State | Beds |
|---|---|---|
| CLARA MAASS MEDICAL CENTER | NJ | 259 |
| PRESENCE SAINTS MARY & ELIZABETH MED | IL | 266 |
| ADVENTIST HEALTH BAKERSFIELD | CA | 254 |
| BRISTOL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER | TN | 244 |
| HOLSTON VALLEY HOSP & MED CTR | TN | 286 |
| SPRINGFIELD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER | OH | 230 |
Distress Analysis
Risk: Elevated
National distress rate: 49.3%
PA distress rate: 48.1%
Model AUC: 0.629
| Factor | Value | Contribution | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net To Gross Ratio | 0.121 | -0.111 | ▼ risk |
| Revenue Per Bed | 492713.970 | +0.064 | ▲ risk |
| Occupancy Rate | 0.582 | -0.053 | ▼ risk |
| Medicare Day Pct | 0.102 | -0.039 | ▼ risk |
| Medicaid Day Pct | 0.074 | -0.015 | ▼ risk |
| Beds | 99.000 | -0.007 | ▼ risk |
RCM Improvement Opportunity
Total (risk-adjusted): $2.6M
Current margin: -9.5%
Projected margin: -4.1%
Grade: D
Comps: 103
Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.
| Lever | Current | Benchmark | Gap | Impact | Confidence | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net-to-Gross Ratio Improvement | 0.121 | 0.353 | 23.2% | $1.3M | 65% | 18mo |
| Occupancy Improvement | 0.582 | 0.779 | 19.7% | $1.3M | 55% | 24mo |
Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)
A
RCM Grade
Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.
| Metric | Predicted | 90% CI | Percentile | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denial Rate | 2.0% | [2.0%, 25.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall |
| Days in AR | 28.0 | [25.0, 75.0] | P44 | Strong — predicted days in ar is in the top third nationally |
| Clean Claim Rate | 98.0% | [80.0%, 98.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third. |
| Net Collection Rate | 99.5% | [90.0%, 99.5%] | P8 | Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third. |