ML Analysis — BERTRAND CHAFFEE HOSPITAL
CCN 330111 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investability Score
Speculative — only pursue if turnaround thesis is strong and entry multiple reflects risk.
42
/ 100 (D)
Financial Health1/25
RCM Upside19/25
Market Position11/20
Demand Defensibility5/15
Operational Efficiency6/15
Entry Multiple: 8.0x – 10.0x
Est. MOIC: 1.9x
Risk Factors:
- Negative operating margin
- Small facility (<50 beds) — limited scale
- Expenses exceed revenue
Catalysts:
- Strong commercial payer base protects revenue
Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)
-25.2%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: -26.5%
Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-53.5%, 3.1%]. P15 nationally.
| Driver | Value | Effect | Explanation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| State Peer Margin | -0.175 | -0.0960 | Lower State Peer Margin decreases predicted margin | |
| Revenue/Bed | 1183739.696 | -0.0552 | Lower Revenue/Bed decreases predicted margin | |
| Reimbursement Quality | 0.383 | -0.0522 | Higher Reimbursement Quality decreases predicted m | |
| Log(Beds) | 3.135 | -0.0288 | Lower Log(Beds) decreases predicted margin | |
| Expense/Bed | 1497705.739 | +0.0196 | Higher Expense/Bed increases predicted margin |
Turnaround: 14%Low turnaround probability (14%). Structural disadvantages in State Peer Margin and Revenue/Bed.
Under-Performing / Distre
Archetype
53.4%
Distress Risk
$2.1M
RCM Opportunity
C
Opportunity Grade
-18.6%
Projected Margin
Cluster: Under-Performing / Distressed
Percentile within cluster: P5. Deeply negative margins signal severe distress. Evaluate asset-level acquisition at 4-6x normalized EBITDA.
Nearest Peers
| Hospital | State | Beds |
|---|---|---|
| HOLY FAMILY MEMORIAL INC | WI | 58 |
| MIDDLESBORO ARH | KY | 46 |
| ATRIUM HEALTH NAVICENT BALDWIN | GA | 86 |
| BON SECOURS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL | NY | 98 |
| ADVANCED SPECIALTY HOSP. OF TOLEDO | OH | 40 |
| COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER BRANCH | MI | 75 |
Distress Analysis
Risk: High
National distress rate: 49.3%
NY distress rate: 84.9%
Model AUC: 0.629
| Factor | Value | Contribution | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Occupancy Rate | 0.318 | +0.192 | ▲ risk |
| Medicaid Day Pct | 0.007 | -0.082 | ▼ risk |
| Net To Gross Ratio | 0.509 | +0.063 | ▲ risk |
| Revenue Per Bed | 1183739.696 | +0.023 | ▲ risk |
| Beds | 23.000 | -0.017 | ▼ risk |
| Medicare Day Pct | 0.241 | -0.015 | ▼ risk |
RCM Improvement Opportunity
Total (risk-adjusted): $2.1M
Current margin: -26.5%
Projected margin: -18.6%
Grade: C
Comps: 28
Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.
| Lever | Current | Benchmark | Gap | Impact | Confidence | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Occupancy Improvement | 0.318 | 0.644 | 32.6% | $2.1M | 55% | 24mo |
Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)
A
RCM Grade
Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.
| Metric | Predicted | 90% CI | Percentile | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denial Rate | 2.0% | [2.0%, 25.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall |
| Days in AR | 32.0 | [25.0, 75.0] | P70 | Strong — predicted days in ar is in the top third nationally |
| Clean Claim Rate | 98.0% | [80.0%, 98.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third. |
| Net Collection Rate | 99.5% | [90.0%, 99.5%] | P8 | Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third. |