Corpus Intelligence ML Analysis — THE REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF ST. 2026-04-26 13:07 UTC
ML Analysis — THE REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF ST.
CCN 263028 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.

Investability Score

Hold / Selective — investigate specific opportunities but be prepared for execution risk.

57
/ 100 (C)
Financial Health7/25
RCM Upside18/25
Market Position15/20
Demand Defensibility13/15
Operational Efficiency4/15
Entry Multiple: 9.5x – 11.5x
Est. MOIC: 2.3x
Risk Factors:
  • Negative operating margin
Catalysts:
  • RCM optimization could add 3-5pp margin
  • Strong commercial payer base protects revenue
  • Limited competition supports pricing power

Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)

-8.2%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: -3.2%

Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-36.5%, 20.1%]. P42 nationally.

DriverValueEffectExplanation
Revenue/Bed380851.691-0.1673
Lower Revenue/Bed decreases predicted margin
Expense/Bed392888.537+0.1557
Higher Expense/Bed increases predicted margin
Reimbursement Quality0.342-0.0405
Higher Reimbursement Quality decreases predicted m
Net-to-Gross0.645+0.0310
Higher Net-to-Gross increases predicted margin
Occupancy × Net-to-Gross0.457+0.0202
Higher Occupancy × Net-to-Gross increases predicte
Turnaround: 36%Turnaround possible (36%) but uncertain. Margin improvement depends on improving Revenue/Bed.
Suburban Community Hospit
Archetype
51.5%
Distress Risk
$2.3M
RCM Opportunity
D
Opportunity Grade
1.2%
Projected Margin

Cluster: Suburban Community Hospital

Percentile within cluster: P53. Community hospitals — the largest PE deal category. Focus on RCM improvement and cost optimization at 9-11x.

Nearest Peers

HospitalStateBeds
CLARA MAASS MEDICAL CENTERNJ259
PRESENCE SAINTS MARY & ELIZABETH MEDIL266
ADVENTIST HEALTH BAKERSFIELDCA254
BRISTOL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERTN244
HOLSTON VALLEY HOSP & MED CTRTN286
SPRINGFIELD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTEROH230

Distress Analysis

Risk: High
National distress rate: 49.3%
MO distress rate: 53.0%
Model AUC: 0.629
FactorValueContributionDirection
Occupancy Rate0.708-0.170▼ risk
Net To Gross Ratio0.645+0.123▲ risk
Revenue Per Bed380851.691+0.071▲ risk
Medicaid Day Pct0.158+0.069▲ risk
Medicare Day Pct0.311-0.003▼ risk
Beds136.000-0.002▼ risk

RCM Improvement Opportunity

Total (risk-adjusted): $2.3M
Current margin: -3.2%
Projected margin: 1.2%
Grade: D
Comps: 41

Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.

LeverCurrentBenchmarkGapImpactConfidenceTimeline
Payer Mix Optimization0.5310.66413.3%$2.0M50%24mo
Occupancy Improvement0.7080.7504.1%$273K55%24mo

Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)

A
RCM Grade

Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.

MetricPredicted90% CIPercentileAssessment
Denial Rate2.0%[2.0%, 25.0%]P0Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall
Days in AR25.0[25.0, 75.0]P0Strong — predicted days in ar is in the top third nationally
Clean Claim Rate98.0%[80.0%, 98.0%]P0Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third.
Net Collection Rate99.5%[90.0%, 99.5%]P8Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third.