Corpus Intelligence ML Analysis — SAINT LUKES NORTH HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 16:11 UTC
ML Analysis — SAINT LUKES NORTH HOSPITAL
CCN 260062 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.

Investability Score

Hold / Selective — investigate specific opportunities but be prepared for execution risk.

54
/ 100 (C)
Financial Health7/25
RCM Upside19/25
Market Position15/20
Demand Defensibility11/15
Operational Efficiency2/15
Entry Multiple: 8.0x – 10.0x
Est. MOIC: 1.9x
Risk Factors:
  • Negative operating margin
  • Expenses exceed revenue
Catalysts:
  • RCM optimization could add 3-5pp margin
  • Strong commercial payer base protects revenue
  • Limited competition supports pricing power

Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)

-5.4%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: -6.4%

Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-33.7%, 22.9%]. P48 nationally.

DriverValueEffectExplanation
Reimbursement Quality0.120+0.0236
Higher Reimbursement Quality increases predicted m
Net-to-Gross0.199-0.0190
Lower Net-to-Gross decreases predicted margin
Expense/Bed1808586.574-0.0186
Higher Expense/Bed decreases predicted margin
Revenue/Bed1700221.111+0.0169
Higher Revenue/Bed increases predicted margin
State Peer Margin-0.062-0.0125
Lower State Peer Margin decreases predicted margin
Turnaround: 41%Turnaround possible (41%) but uncertain. Margin improvement depends on Reimbursement Quality.
Suburban Community Hospit
Archetype
45.2%
Distress Risk
$7.1M
RCM Opportunity
D
Opportunity Grade
-2.5%
Projected Margin

Cluster: Suburban Community Hospital

Percentile within cluster: P31. Community hospitals — the largest PE deal category. Focus on RCM improvement and cost optimization at 9-11x.

Nearest Peers

HospitalStateBeds
CLARA MAASS MEDICAL CENTERNJ259
PRESENCE SAINTS MARY & ELIZABETH MEDIL266
ADVENTIST HEALTH BAKERSFIELDCA254
BRISTOL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERTN244
HOLSTON VALLEY HOSP & MED CTRTN286
SPRINGFIELD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTEROH230

Distress Analysis

Risk: Elevated
National distress rate: 49.3%
MO distress rate: 53.0%
Model AUC: 0.629
FactorValueContributionDirection
Occupancy Rate0.643-0.109▼ risk
Net To Gross Ratio0.199-0.075▼ risk
Medicaid Day Pct0.133+0.044▲ risk
Medicare Day Pct0.268-0.010▼ risk
Revenue Per Bed1700221.111-0.007▼ risk
Beds108.000-0.005▼ risk

RCM Improvement Opportunity

Total (risk-adjusted): $7.1M
Current margin: -6.4%
Projected margin: -2.5%
Grade: D
Comps: 39

Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.

LeverCurrentBenchmarkGapImpactConfidenceTimeline
Net-to-Gross Ratio Improvement0.1990.43023.1%$5.0M65%18mo
Payer Mix Optimization0.6000.6909.0%$1.4M50%24mo
Occupancy Improvement0.6430.76812.5%$827K55%24mo

Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)

A
RCM Grade

Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.

MetricPredicted90% CIPercentileAssessment
Denial Rate2.0%[2.0%, 25.0%]P0Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall
Days in AR26.4[25.0, 75.0]P37Strong — predicted days in ar is in the top third nationally
Clean Claim Rate98.0%[80.0%, 98.0%]P0Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third.
Net Collection Rate99.5%[90.0%, 99.5%]P8Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third.