ML Analysis — YORK HOSPITAL
CCN 200020 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investability Score
Buy — solid fundamentals with identifiable value creation levers. Proceed to detailed diligence.
63
/ 100 (B)
Financial Health9/25
RCM Upside18/25
Market Position15/20
Demand Defensibility10/15
Operational Efficiency10/15
Entry Multiple: 9.5x – 11.5x
Est. MOIC: 2.3x
Risk Factors:
- Negative operating margin
Catalysts:
- Strong commercial payer base protects revenue
- Limited competition supports pricing power
Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)
-3.3%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: -3.6%
Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-31.6%, 25.0%]. P54 nationally.
| Driver | Value | Effect | Explanation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue/Bed | 3650844.370 | +0.2892 | Higher Revenue/Bed increases predicted margin | |
| Expense/Bed | 3783864.185 | -0.2620 | Higher Expense/Bed decreases predicted margin | |
| State Peer Margin | -0.083 | -0.0278 | Lower State Peer Margin decreases predicted margin | |
| Bed Utilization Value | 1705394.425 | +0.0276 | Higher Bed Utilization Value increases predicted m | |
| Bed Count | 54.000 | +0.0148 | Higher Bed Count increases predicted margin |
Turnaround: 44%Turnaround possible (44%) but uncertain. Margin improvement depends on Revenue/Bed.
Suburban Community Hospit
Archetype
47.9%
Distress Risk
$6.2M
RCM Opportunity
D
Opportunity Grade
-0.5%
Projected Margin
Cluster: Suburban Community Hospital
Percentile within cluster: P36. Community hospitals — the largest PE deal category. Focus on RCM improvement and cost optimization at 9-11x.
Nearest Peers
| Hospital | State | Beds |
|---|---|---|
| PROMEDICA HICKMAN HOSPITAL | MI | 58 |
| WATAUGA MEDICAL CENTER | NC | 95 |
| ST LUKES HOSPITAL - EASTON CAMPUS | PA | 29 |
| CULPEPER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | VA | 70 |
| SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL | VA | 80 |
| SPECTRUM HEALTH LUDINGTON | MI | 45 |
Distress Analysis
Risk: Elevated
National distress rate: 49.3%
ME distress rate: 61.1%
Model AUC: 0.629
| Factor | Value | Contribution | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Per Bed | 3650844.370 | -0.122 | ▼ risk |
| Occupancy Rate | 0.467 | +0.054 | ▲ risk |
| Beds | 54.000 | -0.013 | ▼ risk |
| Medicare Day Pct | 0.394 | +0.012 | ▲ risk |
| Net To Gross Ratio | 0.393 | +0.011 | ▲ risk |
| Medicaid Day Pct | 0.089 | +0.000 | ▲ risk |
RCM Improvement Opportunity
Total (risk-adjusted): $6.2M
Current margin: -3.6%
Projected margin: -0.5%
Grade: D
Comps: 15
Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.
| Lever | Current | Benchmark | Gap | Impact | Confidence | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net-to-Gross Ratio Improvement | 0.393 | 0.499 | 10.5% | $2.4M | 65% | 18mo |
| Payer Mix Optimization | 0.516 | 0.663 | 14.7% | $2.2M | 50% | 24mo |
| Occupancy Improvement | 0.467 | 0.710 | 24.2% | $1.6M | 55% | 24mo |
Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)
A
RCM Grade
Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.
| Metric | Predicted | 90% CI | Percentile | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denial Rate | 2.0% | [2.0%, 25.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall |
| Days in AR | 27.6 | [25.0, 75.0] | P41 | Strong — predicted days in ar is in the top third nationally |
| Clean Claim Rate | 98.0% | [80.0%, 98.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third. |
| Net Collection Rate | 99.5% | [90.0%, 99.5%] | P8 | Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third. |