ML Analysis — PIEDMONT CARTERSVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 110030 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investability Score
Hold / Selective — investigate specific opportunities but be prepared for execution risk.
57
/ 100 (C)
Financial Health14/25
RCM Upside15/25
Market Position15/20
Demand Defensibility11/15
Operational Efficiency3/15
Entry Multiple: 9.5x – 11.5x
Est. MOIC: 2.3x
Risk Factors:
Catalysts:
- RCM optimization could add 3-5pp margin
- Strong commercial payer base protects revenue
- Limited competition supports pricing power
Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)
0.5%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: 3.2%
Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-27.8%, 28.8%]. P64 nationally.
| Driver | Value | Effect | Explanation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expense/Bed | 1008192.950 | +0.0800 | Higher Expense/Bed increases predicted margin | |
| Revenue/Bed | 1041331.235 | -0.0751 | Lower Revenue/Bed decreases predicted margin | |
| Reimbursement Quality | 0.072 | +0.0372 | Higher Reimbursement Quality increases predicted m | |
| Net-to-Gross | 0.106 | -0.0295 | Lower Net-to-Gross decreases predicted margin | |
| Occupancy | 0.936 | +0.0233 | Higher Occupancy increases predicted margin |
Suburban Community Hospit
Archetype
36.9%
Distress Risk
$3.8M
RCM Opportunity
D
Opportunity Grade
6.3%
Projected Margin
Cluster: Suburban Community Hospital
Percentile within cluster: P44. Community hospitals — the largest PE deal category. Focus on RCM improvement and cost optimization at 9-11x.
Nearest Peers
| Hospital | State | Beds |
|---|---|---|
| CLARA MAASS MEDICAL CENTER | NJ | 259 |
| PRESENCE SAINTS MARY & ELIZABETH MED | IL | 266 |
| ADVENTIST HEALTH BAKERSFIELD | CA | 254 |
| BRISTOL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER | TN | 244 |
| HOLSTON VALLEY HOSP & MED CTR | TN | 286 |
| SPRINGFIELD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER | OH | 230 |
Distress Analysis
Risk: Elevated
National distress rate: 49.3%
GA distress rate: 44.4%
Model AUC: 0.629
| Factor | Value | Contribution | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Occupancy Rate | 0.936 | -0.381 | ▼ risk |
| Net To Gross Ratio | 0.106 | -0.117 | ▼ risk |
| Revenue Per Bed | 1041331.235 | +0.032 | ▲ risk |
| Medicaid Day Pct | 0.060 | -0.029 | ▼ risk |
| Medicare Day Pct | 0.259 | -0.012 | ▼ risk |
| Beds | 119.000 | -0.004 | ▼ risk |
RCM Improvement Opportunity
Total (risk-adjusted): $3.8M
Current margin: 3.2%
Projected margin: 6.3%
Grade: D
Comps: 54
Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.
| Lever | Current | Benchmark | Gap | Impact | Confidence | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net-to-Gross Ratio Improvement | 0.106 | 0.302 | 19.6% | $2.8M | 65% | 18mo |
| Payer Mix Optimization | 0.681 | 0.749 | 6.7% | $1.0M | 50% | 24mo |
Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)
A
RCM Grade
Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.
| Metric | Predicted | 90% CI | Percentile | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denial Rate | 2.0% | [2.0%, 25.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall |
| Days in AR | 25.0 | [25.0, 75.0] | P28 | Strong — predicted days in ar is in the top third nationally |
| Clean Claim Rate | 98.0% | [80.0%, 98.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third. |
| Net Collection Rate | 99.5% | [90.0%, 99.5%] | P8 | Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third. |