ML Analysis — GLENDALE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL & HLTH CT
CCN 050058 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investability Score
Hold / Selective — investigate specific opportunities but be prepared for execution risk.
51
/ 100 (C)
Financial Health8/25
RCM Upside19/25
Market Position9/20
Demand Defensibility13/15
Operational Efficiency2/15
Entry Multiple: 8.0x – 10.0x
Est. MOIC: 1.9x
Risk Factors:
- Negative operating margin
- Expenses exceed revenue
Catalysts:
- RCM optimization could add 3-5pp margin
- Strong commercial payer base protects revenue
- Volume growth opportunity from low occupancy
Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)
-9.6%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: -17.6%
Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-37.9%, 18.7%]. P38 nationally.
| Driver | Value | Effect | Explanation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue/Bed | 1039292.485 | -0.0754 | Lower Revenue/Bed decreases predicted margin | |
| Expense/Bed | 1222551.519 | +0.0535 | Higher Expense/Bed increases predicted margin | |
| Log(Beds) | 5.485 | +0.0258 | Higher Log(Beds) increases predicted margin | |
| Reimbursement Quality | 0.126 | +0.0217 | Higher Reimbursement Quality increases predicted m | |
| Net-to-Gross | 0.204 | -0.0184 | Lower Net-to-Gross decreases predicted margin |
Turnaround: 34%Turnaround possible (34%) but uncertain. Margin improvement depends on improving Revenue/Bed.
Under-Performing / Distre
Archetype
50.5%
Distress Risk
$6.6M
RCM Opportunity
D
Opportunity Grade
-15.0%
Projected Margin
Cluster: Under-Performing / Distressed
Percentile within cluster: P20. Deeply negative margins signal severe distress. Evaluate asset-level acquisition at 4-6x normalized EBITDA.
Nearest Peers
| Hospital | State | Beds |
|---|---|---|
| HOLY FAMILY MEMORIAL INC | WI | 58 |
| MIDDLESBORO ARH | KY | 46 |
| ATRIUM HEALTH NAVICENT BALDWIN | GA | 86 |
| BON SECOURS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL | NY | 98 |
| ADVANCED SPECIALTY HOSP. OF TOLEDO | OH | 40 |
| COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER BRANCH | MI | 75 |
Distress Analysis
Risk: High
National distress rate: 49.3%
CA distress rate: 49.7%
Model AUC: 0.629
| Factor | Value | Contribution | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Occupancy Rate | 0.434 | +0.085 | ▲ risk |
| Net To Gross Ratio | 0.204 | -0.073 | ▼ risk |
| Revenue Per Bed | 1039292.485 | +0.032 | ▲ risk |
| Beds | 241.000 | +0.012 | ▲ risk |
| Medicaid Day Pct | 0.083 | -0.006 | ▼ risk |
| Medicare Day Pct | 0.300 | -0.005 | ▼ risk |
RCM Improvement Opportunity
Total (risk-adjusted): $6.6M
Current margin: -17.6%
Projected margin: -15.0%
Grade: D
Comps: 193
Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.
| Lever | Current | Benchmark | Gap | Impact | Confidence | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net-to-Gross Ratio Improvement | 0.204 | 0.290 | 8.5% | $2.5M | 65% | 18mo |
| Occupancy Improvement | 0.434 | 0.762 | 32.9% | $2.2M | 55% | 24mo |
| Payer Mix Optimization | 0.617 | 0.745 | 12.8% | $1.9M | 50% | 24mo |
Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)
A
RCM Grade
Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.
| Metric | Predicted | 90% CI | Percentile | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denial Rate | 2.0% | [2.0%, 25.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall |
| Days in AR | 26.7 | [25.0, 75.0] | P38 | Strong — predicted days in ar is in the top third nationally |
| Clean Claim Rate | 98.0% | [80.0%, 98.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third. |
| Net Collection Rate | 99.5% | [90.0%, 99.5%] | P8 | Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third. |