ML Analysis — ST ELIZABETH COMMUNITY HOSPTIAL
CCN 050042 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investability Score
Buy — solid fundamentals with identifiable value creation levers. Proceed to detailed diligence.
61
/ 100 (B)
Financial Health14/25
RCM Upside14/25
Market Position15/20
Demand Defensibility9/15
Operational Efficiency9/15
Entry Multiple: 9.5x – 11.5x
Est. MOIC: 2.3x
Risk Factors:
- Small facility (<50 beds) — limited scale
Catalysts:
- Strong commercial payer base protects revenue
- Limited competition supports pricing power
Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)
3.1%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: 3.5%
Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-25.1%, 31.4%]. P70 nationally.
| Driver | Value | Effect | Explanation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue/Bed | 3248545.980 | +0.2330 | Higher Revenue/Bed increases predicted margin | |
| Expense/Bed | 3134660.980 | -0.1820 | Higher Expense/Bed decreases predicted margin | |
| Bed Utilization Value | 1852679.284 | +0.0325 | Higher Bed Utilization Value increases predicted m | |
| Reimbursement Quality | 0.142 | +0.0171 | Higher Reimbursement Quality increases predicted m | |
| Bed Count | 49.000 | +0.0156 | Higher Bed Count increases predicted margin |
Suburban Community Hospit
Archetype
43.4%
Distress Risk
$7.1M
RCM Opportunity
D
Opportunity Grade
8.0%
Projected Margin
Cluster: Suburban Community Hospital
Percentile within cluster: P10. Community hospitals — the largest PE deal category. Focus on RCM improvement and cost optimization at 9-11x.
Nearest Peers
| Hospital | State | Beds |
|---|---|---|
| PROMEDICA HICKMAN HOSPITAL | MI | 58 |
| WATAUGA MEDICAL CENTER | NC | 95 |
| ST LUKES HOSPITAL - EASTON CAMPUS | PA | 29 |
| CULPEPER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | VA | 70 |
| SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL | VA | 80 |
| SPECTRUM HEALTH LUDINGTON | MI | 45 |
Distress Analysis
Risk: Elevated
National distress rate: 49.3%
CA distress rate: 49.7%
Model AUC: 0.629
| Factor | Value | Contribution | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Per Bed | 3248545.980 | -0.099 | ▼ risk |
| Net To Gross Ratio | 0.252 | -0.052 | ▼ risk |
| Medicaid Day Pct | 0.046 | -0.042 | ▼ risk |
| Occupancy Rate | 0.570 | -0.042 | ▼ risk |
| Beds | 49.000 | -0.013 | ▼ risk |
| Medicare Day Pct | 0.390 | +0.011 | ▲ risk |
RCM Improvement Opportunity
Total (risk-adjusted): $7.1M
Current margin: 3.5%
Projected margin: 8.0%
Grade: D
Comps: 102
Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.
| Lever | Current | Benchmark | Gap | Impact | Confidence | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net-to-Gross Ratio Improvement | 0.252 | 0.478 | 22.6% | $4.2M | 65% | 18mo |
| Payer Mix Optimization | 0.564 | 0.688 | 12.4% | $1.9M | 50% | 24mo |
| Occupancy Improvement | 0.570 | 0.726 | 15.6% | $1.0M | 55% | 24mo |
Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)
A
RCM Grade
Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.
| Metric | Predicted | 90% CI | Percentile | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denial Rate | 2.0% | [2.0%, 25.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall |
| Days in AR | 28.8 | [25.0, 75.0] | P49 | Strong — predicted days in ar is in the top third nationally |
| Clean Claim Rate | 98.0% | [80.0%, 98.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third. |
| Net Collection Rate | 99.5% | [90.0%, 99.5%] | P8 | Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third. |