ML Analysis — LAC OLIVE VIEW/UCLA MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 050040 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investability Score
Buy — solid fundamentals with identifiable value creation levers. Proceed to detailed diligence.
60
/ 100 (B)
Financial Health11/25
RCM Upside20/25
Market Position9/20
Demand Defensibility10/15
Operational Efficiency10/15
Entry Multiple: 9.5x – 11.5x
Est. MOIC: 2.3x
Risk Factors:
- Negative operating margin
- Expenses exceed revenue
Catalysts:
- RCM optimization could add 3-5pp margin
- Strong commercial payer base protects revenue
Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)
-4.1%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: -10.5%
Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-32.4%, 24.2%]. P52 nationally.
| Driver | Value | Effect | Explanation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expense/Bed | 3706760.813 | -0.2525 | Higher Expense/Bed decreases predicted margin | |
| Revenue/Bed | 3355219.267 | +0.2479 | Higher Revenue/Bed increases predicted margin | |
| Reimbursement Quality | 0.390 | -0.0542 | Higher Reimbursement Quality decreases predicted m | |
| Bed Utilization Value | 2096516.674 | +0.0406 | Higher Bed Utilization Value increases predicted m | |
| Log(Beds) | 5.416 | +0.0242 | Higher Log(Beds) increases predicted margin |
Turnaround: 43%Turnaround possible (43%) but uncertain. Margin improvement depends on improving Expense/Bed.
Suburban Community Hospit
Archetype
47.6%
Distress Risk
$1.1M
RCM Opportunity
D
Opportunity Grade
-10.3%
Projected Margin
Cluster: Suburban Community Hospital
Percentile within cluster: P71. Community hospitals — the largest PE deal category. Focus on RCM improvement and cost optimization at 9-11x.
Nearest Peers
| Hospital | State | Beds |
|---|---|---|
| CLARA MAASS MEDICAL CENTER | NJ | 259 |
| PRESENCE SAINTS MARY & ELIZABETH MED | IL | 266 |
| ADVENTIST HEALTH BAKERSFIELD | CA | 254 |
| BRISTOL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER | TN | 244 |
| HOLSTON VALLEY HOSP & MED CTR | TN | 286 |
| SPRINGFIELD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER | OH | 230 |
Distress Analysis
Risk: Elevated
National distress rate: 49.3%
CA distress rate: 49.7%
Model AUC: 0.629
| Factor | Value | Contribution | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Per Bed | 3355219.267 | -0.105 | ▼ risk |
| Occupancy Rate | 0.625 | -0.093 | ▼ risk |
| Medicaid Day Pct | 0.174 | +0.085 | ▲ risk |
| Net To Gross Ratio | 0.534 | +0.074 | ▲ risk |
| Medicare Day Pct | 0.096 | -0.040 | ▼ risk |
| Beds | 225.000 | +0.010 | ▲ risk |
RCM Improvement Opportunity
Total (risk-adjusted): $1.1M
Current margin: -10.5%
Projected margin: -10.3%
Grade: D
Comps: 201
Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.
| Lever | Current | Benchmark | Gap | Impact | Confidence | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Occupancy Improvement | 0.625 | 0.753 | 12.8% | $846K | 55% | 24mo |
| Payer Mix Optimization | 0.730 | 0.747 | 1.7% | $255K | 50% | 24mo |
Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)
A
RCM Grade
Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.
| Metric | Predicted | 90% CI | Percentile | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denial Rate | 2.0% | [2.0%, 25.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall |
| Days in AR | 25.0 | [25.0, 75.0] | P0 | Strong — predicted days in ar is in the top third nationally |
| Clean Claim Rate | 98.0% | [80.0%, 98.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third. |
| Net Collection Rate | 99.5% | [90.0%, 99.5%] | P8 | Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third. |