CRESCENT MEDICAL CENTER LANCASTER
1. Target Overview & Investment Thesis
CRESCENT MEDICAL CENTER LANCASTER is a 84-bed under-performing / distressed in DALLAS, TX with $41.8M in net patient revenue and a -6.2% operating margin. The hospital serves a payer mix of 16.3% Medicare, 1.1% Medicaid, and 82.6% commercial.
Thesis: Turnaround. Our ML models identify $3.1M in annual EBITDA improvement potential from RCM optimization across 5 levers, lifting margin from -6.2% to 1.1% (+736bps).
| Net Revenue HCRIS | $41.8M |
| Current EBITDA COMPUTED | $-2.6M |
| Operating Margin COMPUTED | -6.2% |
| Occupancy HCRIS | 11.1% |
| Revenue / Bed COMPUTED | $498K |
| Net-to-Gross HCRIS | 16.9% |
| Distress Probability ML | 55.4% |
2. Market Context & Competitive Position
TX has 583 Medicare-certified hospitals with a median operating margin of -0.7%. The target's margin of -6.2% places it below the state median. Among 204 size-comparable peers (42-168 beds), the median margin is 2.0%. The target's below-peer margin suggests operational improvement opportunity.
3. RCM Performance Analysis — Comparable Hospitals
Comps selected by bed count (42-168), prioritizing same-state peers. 204 hospitals in the comp set.
| Hospital | State | Beds | Revenue | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRESCENT MEDICAL CENTER LANCAS (Target) | TX | 84 | $41.8M | -6.2% |
| ROUND ROCK HOSPITAL | TX | 165 | $681.4M | 8.7% |
| THE HEART HOSPITAL BAYLOR PLAN | TX | 109 | $464.6M | 25.7% |
| COLLEGE STATION HOSPITAL | TX | 135 | $397.7M | -0.9% |
| DECATUR COMMUNITY HOSPITAL | TX | 81 | $361.0M | -15.5% |
| CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF PL | TX | 72 | $336.7M | 20.9% |
| MEDICAL CITY MCKINNEY | TX | 166 | $302.5M | -0.4% |
| ROUND ROCK MEDICAL CENTER | TX | 161 | $296.7M | 25.7% |
| BAYLOR SW MEDICAL CENTER- WAXA | TX | 123 | $273.6M | 15.9% |
4. Predicted Improvement Opportunities
Improvement targets set at P75 of comparable peers with 60% gap closure assumption. Coefficients calibrated to published research bands. Total EBITDA uplift: $3.1M (736bps margin improvement).
| Lever | Current | Target | EBITDA Impact | Margin | Ramp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Collection Rate | 93.5% | 97.0% | $878K | +210bp | 18mo |
| Cost to Collect | 4.5% | 2.5% | $836K | +200bp | 12mo |
| Denial Rate Reduction | 12.0% | 6.5% | $828K | +198bp | 12mo |
| A/R Days Reduction | 5200.0% | 3800.0% | $509K | +122bp | 9mo |
| Clean Claim Rate | 88.0% | 96.0% | $27K | +6bp | 6mo |
5. EBITDA Bridge
| Current EBITDA | $-2.6M |
| + RCM Uplift | +$3.1M |
| Pro Forma EBITDA | $478K |
| Current Margin | -6.2% |
| Pro Forma Margin | 1.1% |
| WC Released (1x) | $1.6M |
6. Returns Analysis — Scenario Matrix
5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Base case uses 100% of predicted RCM uplift. Bull case: 130% uplift at lower entry. Bear case: 50% uplift at higher entry.
| Scenario | Entry | Exit | Equity In | Equity Out | MOIC | IRR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base Case | 10.0x | 10.0x | $-4.0M | $13.6M | 0.00x | -100.0% |
| Base (11x exit) | 10.0x | 11.0x | $-4.0M | $13.7M | 0.00x | -100.0% |
| Bull Case | 9.0x | 11.0x | $-3.6M | $22.5M | 0.00x | -100.0% |
| Bull (12x exit) | 9.0x | 12.0x | $-3.6M | $23.5M | 0.00x | -100.0% |
| Bear Case | 11.0x | 10.0x | $-4.4M | $-460K | 0.00x | -100.0% |
| Bear (11x exit) | 11.0x | 11.0x | $-4.4M | $-1.9M | 0.00x | -100.0% |
7. Key Risks & Mitigants
| Severity | Risk Factor | Mitigant |
|---|---|---|
| High | Negative operating margin | RCM uplift bridge shows clear path to profitability; working capital release provides near-term cash cushion |
| Medium | Low occupancy | At 11.1%, fixed costs are spread over fewer patient days. Mitigant: volume growth is an additional upside lever not modeled in base case |
| High | Elevated distress probability | Model estimates 55.4% probability of financial distress. Mitigant: distressed entry pricing (7-9x) compensates for risk |
| Low | Low net-to-gross ratio | Large contractual allowances suggest pricing discipline issues. Mitigant: payer renegotiation is an additional upside lever |
8. Data Sources & Methodology Appendix
Data Sources
- CMS HCRIS Cost Reports (Medicare-certified hospitals)
- CMS Medicare Utilization (DRG-level volumes)
- CMS Chronic Conditions (county-level disease prevalence)
- HCRIS multi-year trend data (financial time series)
Comparable Selection
- 204 hospitals with 42-168 beds
- Same-state prioritization (n=205)
- Comp margins: P25=-11.5% / P50=2.0% / P75=11.7%
Bridge Methodology
- Targets: P75 of comparable peers (60% gap closure)
- Denial: avoidable share = 35% of delta × NPR
- AR: bad debt coefficient = $0.65 per day per $1K NPR
- NCR: 60% coefficient on collection rate improvement
- CDI: 0.75% of Medicare revenue per 0.01 CMI point
Returns Assumptions
- Leverage: 5.5x entry (84.6% debt / 15.4% equity)
- Organic growth: 3% annual EBITDA growth
- Debt paydown: 10% of principal per year
- Hold period: 5 years
Generated by SeekingChartis on April 26, 2026. All predictions use public data only. Confidence intervals calibrated via split conformal prediction (90% coverage target). This memo is for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice.