Corpus Intelligence IC Memo — CENTRAL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:03 UTC
IC Memo — CENTRAL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
Investment Committee Memorandum | UT | 25 beds | Grade C | EBITDA uplift $4.5M
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investment Committee Memorandum

CENTRAL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER

CCN 461304 | JUAB, UT | 25 beds | April 26, 2026
EBITDA BridgeData Room
C
Investability

1. Target Overview & Investment Thesis

CENTRAL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER is a 25-bed rural/critical access in JUAB, UT with $60.7M in net patient revenue and a 4.3% operating margin. The hospital serves a payer mix of 50.9% Medicare, 7.0% Medicaid, and 42.1% commercial.

Thesis: Turnaround. Our ML models identify $4.5M in annual EBITDA improvement potential from RCM optimization across 5 levers, lifting margin from 4.3% to 11.6% (+736bps).

Net Revenue HCRIS$60.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED$2.6M
Operating Margin COMPUTED4.3%
Occupancy HCRIS29.9%
Revenue / Bed COMPUTED$2.4M
Net-to-Gross HCRIS70.2%
Distress Probability ML56.9%

2. Market Context & Competitive Position

59
UT Hospitals
8.0%
State Median Margin
28
Comparable Hospitals

UT has 59 Medicare-certified hospitals with a median operating margin of 8.0%. The target's margin of 4.3% places it below the state median. Among 28 size-comparable peers (12-50 beds), the median margin is 4.8%. The target's below-peer margin suggests operational improvement opportunity.

3. RCM Performance Analysis — Comparable Hospitals

Comps selected by bed count (12-50), prioritizing same-state peers. 28 hospitals in the comp set.

HospitalStateBedsRevenueMargin
CENTRAL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER (Target)UT25$60.7M4.3%
CEDAR CITY HOSPITALUT48$136.8M31.4%
GUNNISON VALLEY HOSPITALUT25$130.4M-6.4%
LAYTON HOSPITALUT37$121.1M9.5%
PARK CITY HOSPITALUT37$120.8M13.7%
UINTAH BASIN MEDICAL CENTERUT33$119.9M1.8%
MOUNTAIN WEST MEDICAL CENTERUT36$96.1M38.5%
THE ORTHOPEDIC SPECIALTY HOSPIUT40$88.7M12.4%
CASTLEVIEW HOSPITALUT39$84.5M21.5%

4. Predicted Improvement Opportunities

Improvement targets set at P75 of comparable peers with 60% gap closure assumption. Coefficients calibrated to published research bands. Total EBITDA uplift: $4.5M (736bps margin improvement).

LeverCurrentTargetEBITDA ImpactMarginRamp
Net Collection Rate93.5%97.0%$1.3M+210bp18mo
Cost to Collect4.5%2.5%$1.2M+200bp12mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0%6.5%$1.2M+198bp12mo
A/R Days Reduction5200.0%3800.0%$739K+122bp9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0%96.0%$39K+6bp6mo

5. EBITDA Bridge

Net Collection Rate
$1.3M
Cost to Collect
$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction
$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction
$739K
Clean Claim Rate
$39K
Total EBITDA Uplift$4.5M
Current EBITDA$2.6M
+ RCM Uplift+$4.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA$7.1M
Current Margin4.3%
Pro Forma Margin11.6%
WC Released (1x)$2.3M

6. Returns Analysis — Scenario Matrix

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Base case uses 100% of predicted RCM uplift. Bull case: 130% uplift at lower entry. Bear case: 50% uplift at higher entry.

ScenarioEntryExitEquity InEquity OutMOICIRR
Base Case10.0x10.0x$4.0M$61.7M15.52x73.1%
Base (11x exit)10.0x11.0x$4.0M$69.2M17.40x77.1%
Bull Case9.0x11.0x$3.6M$85.2M23.82x88.5%
Bull (12x exit)9.0x12.0x$3.6M$94.0M26.28x92.3%
Bear Case11.0x10.0x$4.4M$38.1M8.71x54.2%
Bear (11x exit)11.0x11.0x$4.4M$43.3M9.91x58.2%

7. Key Risks & Mitigants

SeverityRisk FactorMitigant
MediumLow occupancyAt 29.9%, fixed costs are spread over fewer patient days. Mitigant: volume growth is an additional upside lever not modeled in base case
HighElevated distress probabilityModel estimates 56.9% probability of financial distress. Mitigant: distressed entry pricing (7-9x) compensates for risk

8. Data Sources & Methodology Appendix

Data Sources

  • CMS HCRIS Cost Reports (Medicare-certified hospitals)
  • CMS Medicare Utilization (DRG-level volumes)
  • CMS Chronic Conditions (county-level disease prevalence)
  • HCRIS multi-year trend data (financial time series)

Comparable Selection

  • 28 hospitals with 12-50 beds
  • Same-state prioritization (n=29)
  • Comp margins: P25=-8.3% / P50=4.8% / P75=12.7%

Bridge Methodology

  • Targets: P75 of comparable peers (60% gap closure)
  • Denial: avoidable share = 35% of delta × NPR
  • AR: bad debt coefficient = $0.65 per day per $1K NPR
  • NCR: 60% coefficient on collection rate improvement
  • CDI: 0.75% of Medicare revenue per 0.01 CMI point

Returns Assumptions

  • Leverage: 5.5x entry (84.6% debt / 15.4% equity)
  • Organic growth: 3% annual EBITDA growth
  • Debt paydown: 10% of principal per year
  • Hold period: 5 years

Generated by SeekingChartis on April 26, 2026. All predictions use public data only. Confidence intervals calibrated via split conformal prediction (90% coverage target). This memo is for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice.