Corpus Intelligence IC Memo — SALT LAKE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:03 UTC
IC Memo — SALT LAKE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
Investment Committee Memorandum | UT | 107 beds | Grade C | EBITDA uplift $4.5M
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investment Committee Memorandum

SALT LAKE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER

CCN 460003 | SALT LAKE, UT | 107 beds | April 26, 2026
EBITDA BridgeData Room
C
Investability

1. Target Overview & Investment Thesis

SALT LAKE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER is a 107-bed under-performing / distressed in SALT LAKE, UT with $61.2M in net patient revenue and a -12.9% operating margin. The hospital serves a payer mix of 22.3% Medicare, 8.5% Medicaid, and 69.3% commercial.

Thesis: Undervalued. Our ML models identify $4.5M in annual EBITDA improvement potential from RCM optimization across 5 levers, lifting margin from -12.9% to -5.6% (+736bps).

Net Revenue HCRIS$61.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED$-7.9M
Operating Margin COMPUTED-12.9%
Occupancy HCRIS16.2%
Revenue / Bed COMPUTED$571K
Net-to-Gross HCRIS33.0%
Distress Probability ML58.1%

2. Market Context & Competitive Position

59
UT Hospitals
8.0%
State Median Margin
15
Comparable Hospitals

UT has 59 Medicare-certified hospitals with a median operating margin of 8.0%. The target's margin of -12.9% places it below the state median. Among 15 size-comparable peers (54-214 beds), the median margin is 25.2%. The target's below-peer margin suggests operational improvement opportunity.

3. RCM Performance Analysis — Comparable Hospitals

Comps selected by bed count (54-214), prioritizing same-state peers. 15 hospitals in the comp set.

HospitalStateBedsRevenueMargin
SALT LAKE REGIONAL MEDICAL CEN (Target)UT107$61.2M-12.9%
LOGAN REGIONAL HOSPITALUT114$320.1M29.3%
OGDEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERUT174$299.3M47.4%
DAVIS HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTEUT175$235.1M29.1%
AMERICAN FORK HOSPITALUT88$216.8M25.3%
RIVERTON HOSPITALUT87$195.8M18.0%
TIMPANOGOS REGIONAL HOSPITALUT117$156.1M38.3%
LONE PEAK HOSPITALUT61$133.1M25.2%
ALTA VIEW HOSPITALUT57$130.9M-0.6%

4. Predicted Improvement Opportunities

Improvement targets set at P75 of comparable peers with 60% gap closure assumption. Coefficients calibrated to published research bands. Total EBITDA uplift: $4.5M (736bps margin improvement).

LeverCurrentTargetEBITDA ImpactMarginRamp
Net Collection Rate93.5%97.0%$1.3M+210bp18mo
Cost to Collect4.5%2.5%$1.2M+200bp12mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0%6.5%$1.2M+198bp12mo
A/R Days Reduction5200.0%3800.0%$744K+122bp9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0%96.0%$39K+6bp6mo

5. EBITDA Bridge

Net Collection Rate
$1.3M
Cost to Collect
$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction
$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction
$744K
Clean Claim Rate
$39K
Total EBITDA Uplift$4.5M
Current EBITDA$-7.9M
+ RCM Uplift+$4.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA$-3.4M
Current Margin-12.9%
Pro Forma Margin-5.6%
WC Released (1x)$2.3M

6. Returns Analysis — Scenario Matrix

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Base case uses 100% of predicted RCM uplift. Bull case: 130% uplift at lower entry. Bear case: 50% uplift at higher entry.

ScenarioEntryExitEquity InEquity OutMOICIRR
Base Case10.0x10.0x$-12.2M$-7.2M0.00x-100.0%
Base (11x exit)10.0x11.0x$-12.2M$-11.9M0.00x-100.0%
Bull Case9.0x11.0x$-11.0M$-983K0.00x-100.0%
Bull (12x exit)9.0x12.0x$-11.0M$-4.3M0.00x-100.0%
Bear Case11.0x10.0x$-13.4M$-25.8M0.00x-100.0%
Bear (11x exit)11.0x11.0x$-13.4M$-32.7M0.00x-100.0%

7. Key Risks & Mitigants

SeverityRisk FactorMitigant
HighNegative operating marginRCM uplift bridge shows clear path to profitability; working capital release provides near-term cash cushion
MediumLow occupancyAt 16.2%, fixed costs are spread over fewer patient days. Mitigant: volume growth is an additional upside lever not modeled in base case
HighElevated distress probabilityModel estimates 58.1% probability of financial distress. Mitigant: distressed entry pricing (7-9x) compensates for risk

8. Data Sources & Methodology Appendix

Data Sources

  • CMS HCRIS Cost Reports (Medicare-certified hospitals)
  • CMS Medicare Utilization (DRG-level volumes)
  • CMS Chronic Conditions (county-level disease prevalence)
  • HCRIS multi-year trend data (financial time series)

Comparable Selection

  • 15 hospitals with 54-214 beds
  • Same-state prioritization (n=16)
  • Comp margins: P25=1.1% / P50=25.2% / P75=31.2%

Bridge Methodology

  • Targets: P75 of comparable peers (60% gap closure)
  • Denial: avoidable share = 35% of delta × NPR
  • AR: bad debt coefficient = $0.65 per day per $1K NPR
  • NCR: 60% coefficient on collection rate improvement
  • CDI: 0.75% of Medicare revenue per 0.01 CMI point

Returns Assumptions

  • Leverage: 5.5x entry (84.6% debt / 15.4% equity)
  • Organic growth: 3% annual EBITDA growth
  • Debt paydown: 10% of principal per year
  • Hold period: 5 years

Generated by SeekingChartis on April 26, 2026. All predictions use public data only. Confidence intervals calibrated via split conformal prediction (90% coverage target). This memo is for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice.