Corpus Intelligence IC Memo — DAY KIMBALL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 15:02 UTC
IC Memo — DAY KIMBALL HOSPITAL
Investment Committee Memorandum | CT | 104 beds | Grade C | EBITDA uplift $7.8M
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investment Committee Memorandum

DAY KIMBALL HOSPITAL

CCN 070003 | WINDHAM, CT | 104 beds | April 26, 2026
EBITDA BridgeData Room
C
Investability

1. Target Overview & Investment Thesis

DAY KIMBALL HOSPITAL is a 104-bed under-performing / distressed in WINDHAM, CT with $106.6M in net patient revenue and a -12.3% operating margin. The hospital serves a payer mix of 27.6% Medicare, 25.1% Medicaid, and 47.3% commercial.

Thesis: Undervalued. Our ML models identify $7.8M in annual EBITDA improvement potential from RCM optimization across 5 levers, lifting margin from -12.3% to -4.9% (+736bps).

Net Revenue HCRIS$106.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED$-13.1M
Operating Margin COMPUTED-12.3%
Occupancy HCRIS34.0%
Revenue / Bed COMPUTED$1.0M
Net-to-Gross HCRIS37.2%
Distress Probability ML58.1%

2. Market Context & Competitive Position

39
CT Hospitals
-6.8%
State Median Margin
17
Comparable Hospitals

CT has 39 Medicare-certified hospitals with a median operating margin of -6.8%. The target's margin of -12.3% places it below the state median. Among 17 size-comparable peers (52-208 beds), the median margin is -6.8%. The target's below-peer margin suggests operational improvement opportunity.

3. RCM Performance Analysis — Comparable Hospitals

Comps selected by bed count (52-208), prioritizing same-state peers. 17 hospitals in the comp set.

HospitalStateBedsRevenueMargin
DAY KIMBALL HOSPITAL (Target)CT104$106.6M-12.3%
JOHN DEMPSEY HOSPITALCT141$590.3M-24.8%
GREENWICH HOSPITALCT186$498.0M-5.9%
MIDDLESEX HOSPITALCT186$449.7M-1.3%
CONNECTICUT CHILDRENS MEDICAL CT187$416.8M-6.7%
THE WILLIAM W. BACKUS HOSPITALCT172$411.7M-4.3%
MIDSTATE MEDICAL CENTERCT143$346.8M-2.3%
ST. MARYS HOSPITALCT163$311.2M-2.5%
THE GRIFFIN HOSPITALCT101$217.2M-13.8%

4. Predicted Improvement Opportunities

Improvement targets set at P75 of comparable peers with 60% gap closure assumption. Coefficients calibrated to published research bands. Total EBITDA uplift: $7.8M (736bps margin improvement).

LeverCurrentTargetEBITDA ImpactMarginRamp
Net Collection Rate93.5%97.0%$2.2M+210bp18mo
Cost to Collect4.5%2.5%$2.1M+200bp12mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0%6.5%$2.1M+198bp12mo
A/R Days Reduction5200.0%3800.0%$1.3M+122bp9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0%96.0%$68K+6bp6mo

5. EBITDA Bridge

Net Collection Rate
$2.2M
Cost to Collect
$2.1M
Denial Rate Reduction
$2.1M
A/R Days Reduction
$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate
$68K
Total EBITDA Uplift$7.8M
Current EBITDA$-13.1M
+ RCM Uplift+$7.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA$-5.2M
Current Margin-12.3%
Pro Forma Margin-4.9%
WC Released (1x)$4.1M

6. Returns Analysis — Scenario Matrix

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Base case uses 100% of predicted RCM uplift. Bull case: 130% uplift at lower entry. Bear case: 50% uplift at higher entry.

ScenarioEntryExitEquity InEquity OutMOICIRR
Base Case10.0x10.0x$-20.1M$-7.9M0.00x-100.0%
Base (11x exit)10.0x11.0x$-20.1M$-15.2M0.00x-100.0%
Bull Case9.0x11.0x$-18.1M$4.1M0.00x-100.0%
Bull (12x exit)9.0x12.0x$-18.1M$-852K0.00x-100.0%
Bear Case11.0x10.0x$-22.2M$-40.6M0.00x-100.0%
Bear (11x exit)11.0x11.0x$-22.2M$-51.8M0.00x-100.0%

7. Key Risks & Mitigants

SeverityRisk FactorMitigant
HighNegative operating marginRCM uplift bridge shows clear path to profitability; working capital release provides near-term cash cushion
MediumElevated Medicaid exposure (25.1%)Medicaid reimburses below cost in most states. Mitigant: denial reduction lever has highest impact on Medicaid claims
MediumLow occupancyAt 34.0%, fixed costs are spread over fewer patient days. Mitigant: volume growth is an additional upside lever not modeled in base case
HighElevated distress probabilityModel estimates 58.1% probability of financial distress. Mitigant: distressed entry pricing (7-9x) compensates for risk

8. Data Sources & Methodology Appendix

Data Sources

  • CMS HCRIS Cost Reports (Medicare-certified hospitals)
  • CMS Medicare Utilization (DRG-level volumes)
  • CMS Chronic Conditions (county-level disease prevalence)
  • HCRIS multi-year trend data (financial time series)

Comparable Selection

  • 17 hospitals with 52-208 beds
  • Same-state prioritization (n=18)
  • Comp margins: P25=-16.6% / P50=-6.8% / P75=-5.5%

Bridge Methodology

  • Targets: P75 of comparable peers (60% gap closure)
  • Denial: avoidable share = 35% of delta × NPR
  • AR: bad debt coefficient = $0.65 per day per $1K NPR
  • NCR: 60% coefficient on collection rate improvement
  • CDI: 0.75% of Medicare revenue per 0.01 CMI point

Returns Assumptions

  • Leverage: 5.5x entry (84.6% debt / 15.4% equity)
  • Organic growth: 3% annual EBITDA growth
  • Debt paydown: 10% of principal per year
  • Hold period: 5 years

Generated by SeekingChartis on April 26, 2026. All predictions use public data only. Confidence intervals calibrated via split conformal prediction (90% coverage target). This memo is for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice.