Corpus Intelligence IC Memo — NOLAND HOSPITAL BIRMINGHAM II 2026-04-26 12:27 UTC
IC Memo — NOLAND HOSPITAL BIRMINGHAM II
Investment Committee Memorandum | AL | 79 beds | Grade D | EBITDA uplift $851K
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investment Committee Memorandum

NOLAND HOSPITAL BIRMINGHAM II

CCN 012009 | JEFFERSON, AL | 79 beds | April 26, 2026
EBITDA BridgeData Room
D
Investability

1. Target Overview & Investment Thesis

NOLAND HOSPITAL BIRMINGHAM II is a 79-bed community hospital in JEFFERSON, AL with $11.5M in net patient revenue and a -0.3% operating margin. The hospital serves a payer mix of 35.1% Medicare, 0.0% Medicaid, and 64.9% commercial.

Thesis: Turnaround. Our ML models identify $851K in annual EBITDA improvement potential from RCM optimization across 5 levers, lifting margin from -0.3% to 7.1% (+740bps).

Net Revenue HCRIS$11.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED$-36K
Operating Margin COMPUTED-0.3%
Occupancy HCRIS28.1%
Revenue / Bed COMPUTED$146K
Net-to-Gross HCRIS35.6%
Distress Probability MLnan%

2. Market Context & Competitive Position

115
AL Hospitals
-8.5%
State Median Margin
43
Comparable Hospitals

AL has 115 Medicare-certified hospitals with a median operating margin of -8.5%. The target's margin of -0.3% places it above the state median. Among 43 size-comparable peers (40-158 beds), the median margin is -14.1%. The target performs in line with or above peers.

3. RCM Performance Analysis — Comparable Hospitals

Comps selected by bed count (40-158), prioritizing same-state peers. 43 hospitals in the comp set.

HospitalStateBedsRevenueMargin
NOLAND HOSPITAL BIRMINGHAM II (Target)AL79$11.5M-0.3%
SOUTH BALDWIN REGIONAL MEDICALAL112$168.2M46.4%
CULLMAN REGIONALAL137$167.1M-4.9%
ATHENS LIMESTONEAL66$88.9M-20.9%
BRYCE HOSPITALAL98$76.4M29.5%
RUSSELL MEDICAL CENTERAL45$75.3M-14.8%
JACK HUGHSTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAAL47$75.2M6.5%
COOSA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTERAL122$73.0M-11.7%
VAUGHAN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTEAL109$63.0M-4.8%

4. Predicted Improvement Opportunities

Improvement targets set at P75 of comparable peers with 60% gap closure assumption. Coefficients calibrated to published research bands. Total EBITDA uplift: $851K (740bps margin improvement).

LeverCurrentTargetEBITDA ImpactMarginRamp
Net Collection Rate93.5%97.0%$242K+210bp18mo
Cost to Collect4.5%2.5%$230K+200bp12mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0%6.5%$230K+200bp12mo
A/R Days Reduction5200.0%3800.0%$140K+122bp9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0%96.0%$10K+8bp6mo

5. EBITDA Bridge

Net Collection Rate
$242K
Cost to Collect
$230K
Denial Rate Reduction
$230K
A/R Days Reduction
$140K
Clean Claim Rate
$10K
Total EBITDA Uplift$851K
Current EBITDA$-36K
+ RCM Uplift+$851K
Pro Forma EBITDA$815K
Current Margin-0.3%
Pro Forma Margin7.1%
WC Released (1x)$441K

6. Returns Analysis — Scenario Matrix

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Base case uses 100% of predicted RCM uplift. Bull case: 130% uplift at lower entry. Bear case: 50% uplift at higher entry.

ScenarioEntryExitEquity InEquity OutMOICIRR
Base Case10.0x10.0x$-55K$8.3M0.00x-100.0%
Base (11x exit)10.0x11.0x$-55K$9.1M0.00x-100.0%
Bull Case9.0x11.0x$-50K$11.9M0.00x-100.0%
Bull (12x exit)9.0x12.0x$-50K$12.9M0.00x-100.0%
Bear Case11.0x10.0x$-61K$4.0M0.00x-100.0%
Bear (11x exit)11.0x11.0x$-61K$4.4M0.00x-100.0%

7. Key Risks & Mitigants

SeverityRisk FactorMitigant
HighNegative operating marginRCM uplift bridge shows clear path to profitability; working capital release provides near-term cash cushion
MediumLow occupancyAt 28.1%, fixed costs are spread over fewer patient days. Mitigant: volume growth is an additional upside lever not modeled in base case

8. Data Sources & Methodology Appendix

Data Sources

  • CMS HCRIS Cost Reports (Medicare-certified hospitals)
  • CMS Medicare Utilization (DRG-level volumes)
  • CMS Chronic Conditions (county-level disease prevalence)
  • HCRIS multi-year trend data (financial time series)

Comparable Selection

  • 43 hospitals with 40-158 beds
  • Same-state prioritization (n=44)
  • Comp margins: P25=-20.9% / P50=-14.1% / P75=6.0%

Bridge Methodology

  • Targets: P75 of comparable peers (60% gap closure)
  • Denial: avoidable share = 35% of delta × NPR
  • AR: bad debt coefficient = $0.65 per day per $1K NPR
  • NCR: 60% coefficient on collection rate improvement
  • CDI: 0.75% of Medicare revenue per 0.01 CMI point

Returns Assumptions

  • Leverage: 5.5x entry (84.6% debt / 15.4% equity)
  • Organic growth: 3% annual EBITDA growth
  • Debt paydown: 10% of principal per year
  • Hold period: 5 years

Generated by SeekingChartis on April 26, 2026. All predictions use public data only. Confidence intervals calibrated via split conformal prediction (90% coverage target). This memo is for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice.