Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 713028 | LA | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $505K → Pro Forma $1.4M (+$937K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$17.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$505K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$937K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$683K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$937K
Modeled Uplift
$694K
Risk-Adjusted
-$244K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$356K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$353K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$217K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$937K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$356K$356K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$343K$10K$353K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$55K$162K$217K$683K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT56.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$89K$178K$267K$356K$356K$356K$356K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$88K$176K$265K$353K$353K$353K$353K
A/R Days Reduction$0$72K$145K$217K$217K$217K$217K$217K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$255K$510K$760K$937K$937K$937K$937K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $937K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x80% / 18.8x84% / 21.2x88% / 23.7x90% / 24.9x92% / 26.1x
9.0x75% / 16.4x79% / 18.5x83% / 20.7x85% / 21.8x87% / 22.9x
10.0x70% / 14.4x75% / 16.4x79% / 18.3x81% / 19.3x83% / 20.3x
11.0x66% / 12.8x71% / 14.6x75% / 16.4x77% / 17.2x79% / 18.1x
12.0x63% / 11.4x67% / 13.1x71% / 14.7x73% / 15.5x75% / 16.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.5x
Headroom (turns)
54%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 54% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.0x, adding 5.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$505K$505K2.8%
Year 1$520K+$625K$1.1M6.4%
Year 2$536K+$937K$1.5M8.3%
Year 3$552K+$937K$1.5M8.4%
Year 4$568K+$937K$1.5M8.5%
Year 5$585K+$937K$1.5M8.5%
$5.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$16.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$11.7M
Value Created
$1.5M
Exit EBITDA
$804K
Organic Growth
$9.4M
RCM Value Creation
$1.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$178K$267K$356K$428K
Denial Rate Reductio$176K$265K$353K$423K
A/R Days Reduction$108K$163K$217K$260K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$11K$14K
Total$469K$703K$937K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 126 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.8%-21.2%-3.8%4.9%
P68
Net-to-Gross51.4%31.5%42.0%56.1%
P68
Occupancy85.7%21.3%46.5%65.1%
P96
Rev/Bed$445K$273K$435K$868K
P50
Exp/Bed$433K$261K$442K$965K
P48

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML