Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NORTH SHORE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 08:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NORTH SHORE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL
CCN 713025 | LA | 30 beds | Current EBITDA $-876K → Pro Forma $-251K (+$624K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$11.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-876K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$624K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-251K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+529bps
Margin Improvement
$452K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$624K
Modeled Uplift
$443K
Risk-Adjusted
-$181K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$236K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$235K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$143K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$624K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$236K$236K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$227K$8K$235K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$36K$107K$143K$452K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT58.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$59K$118K$177K$236K$236K$236K$236K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$59K$118K$176K$235K$235K$235K$235K
A/R Days Reduction$0$48K$96K$143K$143K$143K$143K$143K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$170K$341K$506K$624K$624K$624K$624K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $624K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-876K$-876K-7.4%
Year 1$-902K+$416K$-486K-4.1%
Year 2$-929K+$624K$-305K-2.6%
Year 3$-957K+$624K$-333K-2.8%
Year 4$-985K+$624K$-361K-3.1%
Year 5$-1.0M+$624K$-391K-3.3%
$-8.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-4.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$4.5M
Value Created
$-391K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.4M
Organic Growth
$6.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-391K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$118K$177K$236K$283K
Denial Rate Reductio$118K$176K$235K$282K
A/R Days Reduction$72K$108K$143K$172K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$312K$468K$624K$749K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 138 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-7.4%-16.7%-2.7%6.1%
P40
Net-to-Gross27.3%31.7%43.7%58.1%
P17
Occupancy69.9%21.1%46.4%68.5%
P76
Rev/Bed$393K$282K$460K$868K
P43
Exp/Bed$422K$272K$457K$963K
P45

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML