Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION OF W 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION OF W
CCN 673079 | TX | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $240K → Pro Forma $1.1M (+$827K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$15.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$240K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$827K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$603K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$827K
Modeled Uplift
$566K
Risk-Adjusted
-$262K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$315K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$311K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$191K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$827K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$315K$315K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$303K$9K$311K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$48K$143K$191K$603K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$79K$157K$236K$315K$315K$315K$315K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$78K$156K$234K$311K$311K$311K$311K
A/R Days Reduction$0$64K$128K$191K$191K$191K$191K$191K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$225K$451K$671K$827K$827K$827K$827K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $827K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x98% / 30.4x103% / 34.1x107% / 37.9x109% / 39.7x111% / 41.6x
9.0x93% / 26.6x97% / 30.0x102% / 33.3x104% / 35.0x105% / 36.6x
10.0x88% / 23.7x93% / 26.6x97% / 29.6x99% / 31.1x101% / 32.6x
11.0x84% / 21.2x89% / 23.9x93% / 26.6x95% / 28.0x97% / 29.4x
12.0x81% / 19.2x85% / 21.7x89% / 24.2x91% / 25.4x93% / 26.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.6x
Headroom (turns)
71%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 71% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.9x, adding 6.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$240K$240K1.5%
Year 1$248K+$552K$799K5.1%
Year 2$255K+$827K$1.1M6.9%
Year 3$263K+$827K$1.1M6.9%
Year 4$271K+$827K$1.1M7.0%
Year 5$279K+$827K$1.1M7.0%
$2.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$12.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$9.8M
Value Created
$1.1M
Exit EBITDA
$383K
Organic Growth
$8.3M
RCM Value Creation
$1.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$157K$236K$315K$377K
Denial Rate Reductio$156K$234K$311K$374K
A/R Days Reduction$96K$144K$191K$230K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$10K$12K
Total$414K$621K$827K$993K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 287 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.5%-23.7%-2.9%10.4%
P56
Net-to-Gross62.0%24.4%34.4%51.0%
P85
Occupancy57.1%19.3%44.2%69.4%
P64
Rev/Bed$393K$371K$584K$1.2M
P27
Exp/Bed$387K$402K$631K$1.3M
P23

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML