Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — REHAB HOSPITAL OF FLOWER MOUND 2026-04-26 17:20 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — REHAB HOSPITAL OF FLOWER MOUND
CCN 673076 | TX | 29 beds | Current EBITDA $1.5M → Pro Forma $2.1M (+$682K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$12.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$682K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+528bps
Margin Improvement
$495K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$682K
Modeled Uplift
$491K
Risk-Adjusted
-$191K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$258K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$257K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$157K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$682K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$258K$258K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$249K$8K$257K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$40K$118K$157K$495K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$65K$129K$194K$258K$258K$258K$258K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$64K$128K$193K$257K$257K$257K$257K
A/R Days Reduction$0$52K$105K$157K$157K$157K$157K$157K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$186K$372K$553K$682K$682K$682K$682K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $682K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x
9.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.5x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
10.0x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x
11.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x
12.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.7x
Headroom (turns)
11%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 11% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.8x, adding 2.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.5M$1.5M11.3%
Year 1$1.5M+$455K$2.0M15.2%
Year 2$1.6M+$682K$2.2M17.3%
Year 3$1.6M+$682K$2.3M17.7%
Year 4$1.6M+$682K$2.3M18.0%
Year 5$1.7M+$682K$2.4M18.4%
$14.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$26.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$11.5M
Value Created
$2.4M
Exit EBITDA
$2.3M
Organic Growth
$6.8M
RCM Value Creation
$2.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$129K$194K$258K$310K
Denial Rate Reductio$128K$193K$257K$308K
A/R Days Reduction$79K$118K$157K$189K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$341K$511K$682K$818K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 262 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.3%-33.7%-4.7%10.3%
P77
Net-to-Gross72.7%24.2%34.4%50.0%
P92
Occupancy72.6%14.9%32.0%57.4%
P84
Rev/Bed$445K$427K$654K$1.3M
P27
Exp/Bed$395K$446K$815K$1.4M
P19

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML