Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — EVEREST REHABILITATION HOSPITAL TEMP 2026-04-26 15:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — EVEREST REHABILITATION HOSPITAL TEMP
CCN 673074 | TX | 36 beds | Current EBITDA $-576K → Pro Forma $205K (+$781K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$14.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-576K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$781K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$205K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$569K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$781K
Modeled Uplift
$536K
Risk-Adjusted
-$246K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$297K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$294K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$181K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$781K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$297K$297K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$286K$8K$294K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$46K$135K$181K$569K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$74K$148K$223K$297K$297K$297K$297K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$74K$147K$221K$294K$294K$294K$294K
A/R Days Reduction$0$60K$120K$181K$181K$181K$181K$181K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$213K$426K$634K$781K$781K$781K$781K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $781K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-23.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
30.3x
Headroom (turns)
466%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 466% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -23.8x, adding 122.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-576K$-576K-3.9%
Year 1$-594K+$521K$-73K-0.5%
Year 2$-611K+$781K$170K1.1%
Year 3$-630K+$781K$152K1.0%
Year 4$-649K+$781K$133K0.9%
Year 5$-668K+$781K$113K0.8%
$-5.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$7.0M
Value Created
$113K
Exit EBITDA
$-918K
Organic Growth
$7.8M
RCM Value Creation
$113K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$148K$223K$297K$356K
Denial Rate Reductio$147K$221K$294K$353K
A/R Days Reduction$90K$136K$181K$217K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$391K$586K$781K$938K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 283 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.9%-26.8%-3.9%10.5%
P50
Net-to-Gross55.5%24.4%34.7%49.9%
P81
Occupancy62.1%18.3%40.2%66.7%
P71
Rev/Bed$412K$390K$596K$1.2M
P27
Exp/Bed$428K$411K$690K$1.4M
P29

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML