Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PAM REHAB HOSPITAL OF HOUSTON 2026-04-26 14:30 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PAM REHAB HOSPITAL OF HOUSTON
CCN 673072 | TX | 34 beds | Current EBITDA $3.0M → Pro Forma $3.9M (+$946K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$18.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$946K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$690K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$946K
Modeled Uplift
$686K
Risk-Adjusted
-$260K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$360K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$356K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$219K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$946K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$360K$360K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$346K$10K$356K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$55K$164K$219K$690K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$90K$180K$270K$360K$360K$360K$360K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$89K$178K$267K$356K$356K$356K$356K
A/R Days Reduction$0$73K$146K$219K$219K$219K$219K$219K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$258K$515K$767K$946K$946K$946K$946K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $946K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.8x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
9.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x
10.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x
11.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x
12.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.1x
Headroom (turns)
1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.4x, adding 2.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.0M$3.0M16.4%
Year 1$3.0M+$631K$3.7M20.4%
Year 2$3.1M+$946K$4.1M22.7%
Year 3$3.2M+$946K$4.2M23.2%
Year 4$3.3M+$946K$4.3M23.7%
Year 5$3.4M+$946K$4.4M24.3%
$29.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$48.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$18.5M
Value Created
$4.4M
Exit EBITDA
$4.7M
Organic Growth
$9.5M
RCM Value Creation
$4.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$180K$270K$360K$432K
Denial Rate Reductio$178K$267K$356K$427K
A/R Days Reduction$109K$164K$219K$263K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$14K
Total$473K$709K$946K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 275 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin16.4%-26.8%-3.8%10.5%
P84
Net-to-Gross55.2%24.4%35.6%51.8%
P79
Occupancy75.4%17.2%37.6%66.0%
P81
Rev/Bed$529K$412K$602K$1.2M
P41
Exp/Bed$442K$416K$699K$1.4M
P28

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML