Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SOUTH PLAINS REHABILITATION HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SOUTH PLAINS REHABILITATION HOSPITAL
CCN 673070 | TX | 66 beds | Current EBITDA $6.8M → Pro Forma $8.8M (+$1.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$36.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$8.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$1.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$457K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.5M (vs $1.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$728K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$721K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$443K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$23K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$728K$728K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$701K$20K$721K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$112K$331K$443K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$23K$23K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$182K$364K$546K$728K$728K$728K$728K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$180K$361K$541K$721K$721K$721K$721K
A/R Days Reduction$0$148K$295K$443K$443K$443K$443K$443K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K
Cumulative$0$522K$1.0M$1.6M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
9.0x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
10.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x
11.0x35% / 4.4x39% / 5.3x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x
12.0x30% / 3.8x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.1x
Headroom (turns)
-2%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -2% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.6x, adding 1.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.8M$6.8M18.8%
Year 1$7.0M+$1.3M$8.3M22.8%
Year 2$7.3M+$1.9M$9.2M25.2%
Year 3$7.5M+$1.9M$9.4M25.8%
Year 4$7.7M+$1.9M$9.6M26.4%
Year 5$7.9M+$1.9M$9.8M27.0%
$68.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$108.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$39.9M
Value Created
$9.8M
Exit EBITDA
$10.9M
Organic Growth
$19.2M
RCM Value Creation
$9.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$364K$546K$728K$874K
Denial Rate Reductio$361K$541K$721K$865K
A/R Days Reduction$222K$332K$443K$532K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$17K$23K$28K
Total$958K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 226 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin18.8%-14.4%0.2%10.8%
P87
Net-to-Gross56.2%19.1%30.3%48.3%
P83
Occupancy96.9%35.4%56.2%74.9%
P99
Rev/Bed$552K$301K$545K$1.1M
P50
Exp/Bed$448K$323K$489K$1.1M
P42

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML