Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PAM HEALTH REHAB HOSP OF SUGAR LAND 2026-04-26 09:32 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PAM HEALTH REHAB HOSP OF SUGAR LAND
CCN 673068 | TX | 41 beds | Current EBITDA $12.0M → Pro Forma $13.0M (+$1.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$19.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$12.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$13.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$750K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$1.0M
Modeled Uplift
$724K
Risk-Adjusted
-$305K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$391K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$387K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$238K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$13K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$391K$391K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$377K$11K$387K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$60K$178K$238K$750K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$13K$13K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$98K$196K$293K$391K$391K$391K$391K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$97K$194K$291K$387K$387K$387K$387K
A/R Days Reduction$0$79K$159K$238K$238K$238K$238K$238K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K
Cumulative$0$280K$561K$835K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
9.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x
10.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x
11.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.1x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x
12.0x23% / 2.8x28% / 3.5x33% / 4.2x35% / 4.5x37% / 4.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-1.3x
Headroom (turns)
-20%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -20% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.8x, adding 0.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$12.0M$12.0M61.4%
Year 1$12.4M+$686K$13.1M66.7%
Year 2$12.7M+$1.0M$13.8M70.4%
Year 3$13.1M+$1.0M$14.1M72.3%
Year 4$13.5M+$1.0M$14.5M74.3%
Year 5$13.9M+$1.0M$14.9M76.4%
$120.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$164.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$44.4M
Value Created
$14.9M
Exit EBITDA
$19.1M
Organic Growth
$10.3M
RCM Value Creation
$14.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$196K$293K$391K$470K
Denial Rate Reductio$194K$291K$387K$465K
A/R Days Reduction$119K$179K$238K$286K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$13K$15K
Total$515K$772K$1.0M$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 279 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin61.4%-22.8%-2.6%10.5%
P100
Net-to-Gross48.7%24.4%34.4%50.3%
P71
Occupancy62.5%20.0%44.7%70.5%
P68
Rev/Bed$477K$381K$584K$1.2M
P36
Exp/Bed$184K$402K$622K$1.3M
P5

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML