Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHI ST. JOSEPH HEALTH REHABILITATION 2026-04-26 14:13 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHI ST. JOSEPH HEALTH REHABILITATION
CCN 673065 | TX | 61 beds | Current EBITDA $5.2M → Pro Forma $6.8M (+$1.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$29.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$1.6M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$403K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$590K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$585K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$359K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$19K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$590K$590K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$568K$16K$585K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$91K$269K$359K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$19K$19K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$148K$295K$443K$590K$590K$590K$590K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$146K$292K$438K$585K$585K$585K$585K
A/R Days Reduction$0$120K$239K$359K$359K$359K$359K$359K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K
Cumulative$0$423K$846K$1.3M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x61% / 11.0x
9.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.4x
10.0x39% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x
11.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x
12.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.0x
Headroom (turns)
-0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.5x, adding 1.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.2M$5.2M17.7%
Year 1$5.4M+$1.0M$6.4M21.7%
Year 2$5.5M+$1.6M$7.1M24.0%
Year 3$5.7M+$1.6M$7.3M24.6%
Year 4$5.9M+$1.6M$7.4M25.2%
Year 5$6.0M+$1.6M$7.6M25.7%
$52.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$83.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$31.4M
Value Created
$7.6M
Exit EBITDA
$8.3M
Organic Growth
$15.5M
RCM Value Creation
$7.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$295K$443K$590K$709K
Denial Rate Reductio$292K$438K$585K$701K
A/R Days Reduction$180K$269K$359K$431K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$14K$19K$23K
Total$777K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 229 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin17.7%-14.4%-0.2%10.8%
P86
Net-to-Gross61.7%19.3%30.5%49.0%
P86
Occupancy84.0%33.6%56.1%72.5%
P87
Rev/Bed$484K$310K$544K$1.1M
P43
Exp/Bed$398K$326K$494K$1.1M
P33

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML