Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WARM SPRINGS REHAB HOSP KYLE 2026-04-26 12:35 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WARM SPRINGS REHAB HOSP KYLE
CCN 673057 | TX | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $4.7M → Pro Forma $6.0M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$24.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$946K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$969K
Risk-Adjusted
-$329K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$494K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$489K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$300K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$16K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$494K$494K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$475K$14K$489K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$76K$225K$300K$946K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$16K$16K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$123K$247K$370K$494K$494K$494K$494K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$122K$244K$366K$489K$489K$489K$489K
A/R Days Reduction$0$100K$200K$300K$300K$300K$300K$300K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K
Cumulative$0$354K$707K$1.1M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
9.0x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
10.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x
11.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x
12.0x30% / 3.8x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.1x
Headroom (turns)
-2%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -2% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.6x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.7M$4.7M19.0%
Year 1$4.8M+$865K$5.7M23.1%
Year 2$5.0M+$1.3M$6.3M25.4%
Year 3$5.1M+$1.3M$6.4M26.0%
Year 4$5.3M+$1.3M$6.6M26.7%
Year 5$5.4M+$1.3M$6.7M27.3%
$46.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$74.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$27.2M
Value Created
$6.7M
Exit EBITDA
$7.5M
Organic Growth
$13.0M
RCM Value Creation
$6.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$247K$370K$494K$592K
Denial Rate Reductio$244K$366K$489K$586K
A/R Days Reduction$150K$225K$300K$360K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$16K$19K
Total$649K$974K$1.3M$1.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 287 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin19.0%-23.7%-2.9%10.4%
P88
Net-to-Gross45.7%24.4%34.4%51.0%
P67
Occupancy85.1%19.3%44.2%69.4%
P90
Rev/Bed$617K$371K$584K$1.2M
P53
Exp/Bed$500K$402K$631K$1.3M
P43

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML