Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 673052 | TX | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $994K → Pro Forma $2.6M (+$1.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$29.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$994K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$1.6M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$443K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$596K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$590K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$363K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$19K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$596K$596K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$574K$16K$590K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$91K$271K$363K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$19K$19K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$149K$298K$447K$596K$596K$596K$596K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$148K$295K$443K$590K$590K$590K$590K
A/R Days Reduction$0$121K$242K$363K$363K$363K$363K$363K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K
Cumulative$0$427K$854K$1.3M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x76% / 16.8x80% / 19.0x84% / 21.2x86% / 22.3x88% / 23.4x
9.0x71% / 14.6x75% / 16.5x79% / 18.5x81% / 19.5x83% / 20.5x
10.0x66% / 12.8x71% / 14.6x75% / 16.3x77% / 17.2x78% / 18.1x
11.0x62% / 11.3x67% / 12.9x71% / 14.6x73% / 15.4x74% / 16.2x
12.0x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.6x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.2x
Headroom (turns)
50%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 50% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.3x, adding 5.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$994K$994K3.3%
Year 1$1.0M+$1.0M$2.1M6.9%
Year 2$1.1M+$1.6M$2.6M8.8%
Year 3$1.1M+$1.6M$2.7M8.9%
Year 4$1.1M+$1.6M$2.7M9.0%
Year 5$1.2M+$1.6M$2.7M9.1%
$9.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$29.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$20.0M
Value Created
$2.7M
Exit EBITDA
$1.6M
Organic Growth
$15.7M
RCM Value Creation
$2.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$298K$447K$596K$716K
Denial Rate Reductio$295K$443K$590K$708K
A/R Days Reduction$181K$272K$363K$435K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$14K$19K$23K
Total$784K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 232 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.3%-14.4%0.1%11.4%
P58
Net-to-Gross68.4%19.4%30.6%49.7%
P91
Occupancy73.9%33.2%56.1%72.4%
P75
Rev/Bed$497K$318K$544K$1.1M
P47
Exp/Bed$480K$327K$492K$1.1M
P48

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML